Archive for November, 2017

Parentheses in Revelation 13

November 24, 2017

Bible Believers’ Newsletter 1000

“We focus on the present Truth — what Jesus is doing now. . .”
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ, and welcome to His brothers, sisters and friends who love and are able to receive the Truth in He who is “the way, and the truth, and eternal Life.” It is our under-serving privilege to share fellowship with you.

Android PhoneThis week Euthanasia legislation passed in the lower house of the parliament of Victoria, Australia. This is Rockefeller policy that was introduced into the united States and Germany prior to World War II; its introduction in Australia and other countries at this time confirms the reality of what Peter called “the present Truth” for it reflects the spirit of Laodicea which means “rights of the people” or Judaeo-Communism that was first trialled by Judaeo-Jesuits who introduced it into Paraguay in 1609 and continued to 1843. This legislation shows us that Satan ,who is named “death” under the Fourth Seal of Revelation 6:8, is on his last ride!

Also this week “Marriage Equality” legislation passed in the Federal Parliament with the assistance from Georg Soros, his “Get up” and related fronts. This is another perverse encouragement to Christ’s end-time Bride signalling the imminent end of the Christian dispensation, manifestation of the Sons of God, first resurrection and translation.

Our main article, “Parentheses in Revelation 13,” traces the rise of the beast throughout “the times of the Gentiles” to Satan’s incarnation through the four successive Gentile world empires whose attributes coalesce in a global church kingdom that spawns a subordinate image that directs, nay, forces worship of itself. Satan will incarnate “that man of sin, the son of perdition.” Revelation 13:11-18, modern history and the daily news confirm the destiny of the united States of America is the image unto the beast.

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott

Urgent Prayer Request

November 16, 2017 — Prosecutors are moving to have at least 21 sermons, including “An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages,” banned in Russia. Rumours of arrests and confiscation of a container of material are untrue.

Prosecutors are arguing extremism; however, whoever brought the case against has spliced quotations from various sermons to misrepresent what Brother Branham was teaching. The court, scheduled for Monday, November 20, will determine whether to allow or ban the literature.

Please petition the Lord in behalf of His Work and the saints in Russia. Full story:

Criminal War Propaganda

al Qaeda=CIA

November 7, 2017 — The Pentagon budget alone for illegal war propaganda is about $626,000,000 per year . . . contamination of the public mindset is a necessary precondition to aggressive, criminal warfare in furtherance of a self-devouring political economy. Once the public is convinced that there is a War On Terror (which is a Big Lie), further astronomical transfers of money from the people to the oligarchs and narrow vested interests—all to the detriment of the vast majority of the population—are easy to justify.

Over the course of the dirty war on Syria, for example, the annual CIA budget in support of the terrorists invading Syria—all of the terrorists—has been about $1,000,000,000 per year, and that is only a small fraction of monies spent to support terrorism in Syria. Bill Van Auken notes in “General lets slip US Escalation in Syria” that Washington’s “key regional allies, Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey, poured in billions more to ignite a war that has killed hundreds of thousands and turned millions into refugees

. . . A new trend now is to re-brand al Qaeda—and all of the terrorists invading Syria are al Qaeda or al Qaeda affiliates, including ISIS—as the “good guys.” Syrian Ambassador to the UN, Bashar Ja’afari is well aware of the importance of word choices and how words are used to contaminate public perceptions. He stresses the importance, for example, of recognizing that the Syrian government is a government, and not a “regime”.

Similarly, the terrorists are not “Islamic” not only because of their deviant ideology, but especially because their actions defy any sane notions of Islam. Nor are the terrorists “jihadis,” especially since some of their most ardent supporters are Zionists. And of course the war isn’t a civil war. The terrorists are there because of the West and its allies, not despite the West and its allies. When incorrect nomenclature is used and repeated, however, public perceptions invariably shift . . . Journalists who prostitute themselves by telling their fellow citizens lies are . . . war criminals and should be judged as such . . . Full story:

Comment: The destiny of the United States is Revelation 13:11-18.

When RussiaGate goes Really, Really, Really Viral

biological warfare

November 1, 2017 — Russian genetic material is being harvested all over the country, purposefully and professionally . . . the latest chilling reminder of the globalist war on Russia . . . foreign viewers recording the people in these [Russian] elections, and more freakishly, tissue samples being taken from “. . . different ethnic groups and people living in different geographical regions of the Russian Federation.” Mr. Putin went on to assure his audience there is nothing to be afraid of, for Russia’s intelligence community is well armed to deal with such an attack . . . a July tender from the US Air Force Air Education and Training Command on a US government website seeking to acquire samples of ribonucleic acid (RNA) and synovial fluid from Russians . . .

A member of the UN Commission on Biological Weaponry, Igor Nikulin told reporters:

“New types of biological weapons are being developed. There’s nothing else that could possibly interest the military department. Most likely, they are weaponized viruses. The US is trying to develop various types of biological weapons specifically for specific carriers of this gene pool, and Caucasoids are needed since they constitute the majority of the population of our country. This is the same focus group for which they are trying to find the samples. It’s necessary for the viruses to act selectively on one or another ethnic group.”

. . . DNA research could be capable of killing on the individual level at some point. Reading the advertisement by the Air Force sends a chill up my spine, for it is damning to the extreme. Not only does the ad spell out the exact “sample” quantity etc, it spells out how the Air Force will pay would-be DNA spies:

“In addition, information on donors must be provided with the samples, including their sex, age, ethnicity, smoking history, medical history, height, weight and Body Mass Index (BMI). The samples must be delivered to the Lockland Air Force Base near San Antonio, Texas, within 10 days after the contractor receives the money.”

. . . Russian media aside, the facts of US biological weapons research aimed at Russia and ALL other perceived enemies is abundant. This report from Air Force Colonel Michael J. Ainscough from back in 2002 outlines how “future” bioweapons will be developed, deployed, and used. From this report we learned that the Pentagon under the Bush Administration was not nearly as concerned with Iraq’s WMDs, but instead focused heavily on bioweapons of the former Soviet Union (Chapter I). However, damning the implications of the colonel’s focus may be, Colonel Ainscough’s paper was clearly intended to be used to justify America’s later stage bio-weapons developments. Ideas like weaponizing the deadly Ebola virus soon became weapons research reality.

This report from The Atlantic (of all places) told us back in 2012, that Putin and other world leaders might already be in danger of a hit by some DNA weapon or other. To quote the lead from 2012:

“The US government is surreptitiously collecting the DNA of world leaders, and is reportedly protecting that of Barack Obama. Decoded, these genetic blueprints could provide compromising information. In the not-too-distant future, they may provide something more as well—the basis for the creation of personalized bioweapons that could take down a president and leave no trace” . . . Full story:

Comment: “The Bible predicts that in the last days, that they’ll be a germ warfare . . . on everyone without the baptism of the Holy Spirit” (God’s Provided Way of Healing, #54-0719A). “Germ warfare . . . the Bible said that man would actually rot in their flesh . . . But that Angel was given commission, Don’t touch those who has the Seal of God upon their forehead” (God’s Provided Way of Approach to Fellowship, #60-0709; Leviticus 26:16; Deuteronomy 28:21-22; Zechariah 14:12).

The Truth about Radical Islam

hidden hand

November 8, 2017 — There are approximately 1.8 billion Muslims on Earth. That is approximately 24% of the world population. They live in regions spanning North Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, and reaching as far as Southeast Asia. There are Muslim communities in virtually every nation—and in many—they have played a pivotal, constructive, and welcomed role in national development.

If even 1% of the world’s Muslims were violent terrorists bent on conquering the world, that would constitute an army 18 million strong—or in other words—larger than the next 20 largest armies on Earth combined. Most critics of Islam infer that the number is actually much higher than 1%—many suggesting that the majority of Muslims either are engaged in or support terrorism. It is logical to conclude that if even 1% were dedicated to terrorism and the “conquest of infidels,” the war would have ended in their favour long ago.

It is clear that not even 1% across Islam is engaged in or supporting terrorism. Across the Arab World, the vast majority of Muslims, Christians, other sects, and the secular, stand united against terrorism. It is clear that a mountain of lies stands between many and the truth—a mountain built so tall that it leaves entire segments of targeted populations in the perpetual darkness of ignorance.

Three sovereign city statesThe source of terrorism is not the Qu’ran . . . but rather a very easily traced money trail that leads to Washington and London . . . the Western World that has created, branded, and marketed “radical Islam” . . . a strictly political tool designed to provoke direct Western military interventions where possible, and fight conflicts by proxy whenever direct military intervention is not possible.

In Syria and Iraq, the US has used its terrorist proxies to do both—first to fight the government of Damascus and its allies by proxy, and when that failed, to set a pretext for direct US military intervention . . . domestically . . . the United States and much of Europe has been transformed into an invasive police state . . . For those that have been sucked up into “radical Islam,” it seems very real. Just as the US uses patriotism to convince young men and women to devote their lives to foreign invasions, wars, and occupations against scores of sovereign nations around the world—predicated on “freedom, democracy, and self-determination” even as US militarism strips all of the above away from the planet . . . “radical Islam” does not exist in a vacuum. It requires a medium to interact with . . . equally extreme, but opposite “radical ignorance” and fear sown across the Western population. Together, the two feed each other . . . Militant Islam is a relatively new phenomenon, invented by the [Dönmeh Jew] House of Saud, then cultivated and exploited to its full potential by the British Empire and its American heirs . . . As the British Empire unravelled, the Americans picked up where [the Jews’ City of] London left off . . .

Muslims and Islam are blamed and the same collection of elementary talking points are rolled out to fan the flames of hatred and hysteria. Points of logic including the number of Muslims on Earth versus the actual number of terrorists are never discussed. Also never discussed is the fact that terrorists—particularly those either members of the self-titled “Islamic State” (ISIS) and Al Qaeda, or those inspired by such groups—are indoctrinated, radicalized, armed, funded, and supported by Washington, London, Brussels, and a collection of the West’s closest allies in the Middle East—namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, and Israel.

It was in a leaked 2012 US Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA) memo that revealed the US and its allies’ intent to create what it called a “Salafist principality” in eastern Syria. The memo would explicitly state that (emphasis added):

If the situation unravels there is the possibility of establishing a declared or undeclared Salafist principality in eastern Syria (Hasaka and Der Zor), and this is exactly what the supporting powers to the opposition want, in order to isolate the Syrian regime, which is considered the strategic depth of the Shia expansion (Iraq and Iran).

On clarifying who these supporting powers were, the DIA memo would state:

The West, Gulf countries, and Turkey support the opposition; while Russia, China, and Iran support the regime.

The “Salafist” (Islamic) “principality” (State) would indeed be created precisely in eastern Syria as US policymakers and their allies had set out to do. It would be branded as the “Islamic State” and be used first to wage a more muscular proxy war against Damascus, and when that failed, to invite US military forces to intervene in the conflict directly.

In 2014, in an e-mail between US Counsellor to the President John Podesta and former US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, it would be admitted that two of America’s closest regional allies—Saudi Arabia and Qatar—were providing financial and logistical support to ISIS.

The e-mail, leaked to the public through Wikileaks, stated:

. . . we need to use our diplomatic and more traditional intelligence assets to bring pressure on the governments of Qatar and Saudi Arabia, which are providing clandestine financial and logistic support to [ISIS] and other radical Sunni groups in the region.

Rome's baby

Despite admissions from the United States military and high-level politicians that ISIS was literally a creation of its own intentional foreign policy and perpetuated through state-sponsorship by America’s closest regional allies, both the administrations of President Barack Obama and President Trump would continue signing weapon deals, maintaining diplomatic ties, and strengthening military and economic cooperation with these state-sponsors of terror.

Simultaneously, the US and Europe also continue encouraging and protecting Saudi Arabia’s global network of faux-madrases—centers of indoctrination often under the watch and even co-management of Western intelligence agencies ensuring a constant, fresh supply of potential patsies for local terrorist attacks and recruits for the West’s proxy armies fighting abroad.

In other words, the problem of “radical Islam” is manufactured and perpetuated by the West. Without the money, weapons, and support provided by the US and Europe to nations like Saudi Arabia, their toxic political tools would quickly dull and be swept into the dustbin of human history. As seen in Syria itself, where hundreds of trucks per day from NATO territory are no longer able to supply ISIS positions within the country, ISIS is unable to sustain itself. It lacks genuine popular support in a region where the vast majority of Muslims, Christians, and the secular remain united against it and has no means of sustaining itself without immense and constant state sponsorship . . .

But for those with the moral integrity to do so, a genuine look into “radical Islam” will reveal a much more troubling and real enemy. One that does not menace us with a foreign culture, religion, or ideology from abroad, but one that lies right in our midst, cloaked in patriotism, humanitarianism, and all that passes for “Western civilization” today. Full story:

Comment: Here are the facts: Albert Pike designed a plan for world conquest and wrote of it in a letter to Mazzini dated August 15, 1871. He said three future world wars would prepare the world for the New World Order. Pike’s plan for the Illuminati was as simple as it has proved effective. He required that Communism, Nazism, Political Zionism, and other International movements be organized and used to foment the three global wars and three major revolutions.

The First World War was to be fought so as to enable the Illuminati to overthrow the powers of the Tsars in Russia and turn that country into the stronghold of Atheistic-Communism. The differences stirred up by agentur of the Illuminati between the British and German Empires were to be used to foment this war. After the war ended, Communism was to be built up and used to destroy other governments and weaken religions.

World War Two was to be fomented by using the differences between Fascists and Political Zionists. This war was to be fought so that Nazism would be destroyed and the power of Political Zionism increased so that the sovereign state of Israel could be established in Palestine. During World War Two International Communism was to be built up until it equalled in strength that of united Christendom. At this point it was to be contained and kept in check until required for the final social cataclysm. Can any informed person deny Roosevelt and Churchill did put this policy into effect? [As Jesus showed Brother Branham in Revelation 16:12-14 and in his apocalypse of continuous visions; five are fulfilled, the sixth and seventh are at hand].

World War Three is to be fomented using the differences the agentur of the Illuminati stir up between Political Zionists and the leaders of the Moslem world. The war is to be directed in such a manner that Islam (the Arab World including Mohammedanism) and Political Zionism (including the State of Israel) will destroy themselves while at the same time the remaining nations, once more divided against each other on this issue, will be forced to fight themselves into a state of complete exhaustion physically, mentally, spiritually and economically. Can any unbiased and reasoning person deny that the intrigue now going on in the Near, Middle, and Far East is designed to accomplish this devilish purpose?

After World War Three is ended, those who aspire to undisputed world domination will provoke the greatest social cataclysm the world has ever known. We quote his own written words taken from the letter catalogued in the British Museum Library, London, England.

“We shall unleash the Nihilists and Atheists, and we shall provoke a formidable social cataclysm which in all its horror will show clearly to the nations the effect of absolute atheism, origin of savagery and of the most bloody turmoil. Then everywhere, the citizens, obliged to defend themselves against the world minority of revolutionaries, will exterminate those destroyers of civilization, and the multitude, disillusioned with Christianity, whose deistic spirits will be from that moment without compass (direction), anxious for an ideal, but without knowing where to render its adoration, will receive the true light through the universal manifestation of the pure doctrine of Lucifer, brought finally out in the public view, a manifestation which will result from the general reactionary movement which will follow the destruction of Christianity and atheism, both conquered and exterminated at the same time” (William Guy Carr, Pawns in the Game, p. xv-xvi). This strategy is also recognized by Dr. Dennis L. Cuddy PhD. in The Power Elite’s use of Wars and Crises.


Parentheses in Revelation 13

In studying Revelation 12 we discovered a parenthesis in verses 1-6 encapsulating the conversion of the “woman,” Israel’s elect, from the Law to grace on the Day of Pentecost to bear the “man child” or New Testament Church which was comprised primarily of Israelites until the seventh century. The birth of Jesus by the virgin Mary in 4BC was a secondary analogy under dominion of “the red dragon” of Imperial Rome and the persecution of Herod the Great thirty-three years before the Day of Pentecost, and before Judeans, seduced by Talmudic tales, crucified Messiah and were blotted from the Book of Life (Isaiah 9:15-16; Exodus 32:33; Joshua 5:6; Psalm 95:10-11; John 6:49; Hebrews 6:4-8; Jude 5).

After the Pergamean Church Age (AD312-606) the “woman” or Church, then comprised of mainly Gentile converts, fled to the New World to worship according to faith and conscience. Verse 6 was God’s promise to America showing us how Israel, which fled Egypt via the wilderness to the Promised Land then ended in apostasy, destruction and dissolution, types the sparsely populated wilderness of America whence the Church fled and built a great nation that is now apostate and will end in nuclear annihilation (Romans 11:32). Israel’s first kings David and Solomon were great men, like America’s first presidents, Washington and Lincoln; then Ahab and his pagan Serpent’s seed wife were enthroned and a series of pharaoh’s who did not know our Joseph occupied the White House. Hence last and seventh vision of Brother Branham’s 1933 apocalypse “was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America” (An Exposition of the Seventh Church Age, p. 322:3).

Verses 7-17 bring us to the casting down of Satan with his followers at the end of the Gentile dispensation after our translation with a retrospect of the martyred Church Age saints (Revelation 7:9-14; 20:4). In verses 12-14 Satan is cast down to earth to persecute “the woman,” once more elect Israelites gathered into the spiritual wilderness of the Land of the Covenant by “the two witnesses” of Zechariah 4, Matthew 24:31 and Revelation 11 in the first half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week as promised in Isaiah 11:10-12.

Verses 15-16 transport us to the midst of Daniel’s Seventieth Week: Rome has broken her covenant with the International Jews, enforced her trinitarian religion, martyred Israel’s two witnesses and sent NATO to martyr the 144,000 (Revelation 17:12-13). An earthquake “swallows up” her army. This is the earthquake of Revelation 11:13 that marks the resurrection and ascension of the two witnesses. In Revelation 12 Satan and his host were cast down to earth to incarnate his people; verse 17 begins the second half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week.

NATO revived Roman EmpireRevelation 13:1-10 introduces a parenthesis tracing the development of the beast through “the times of the Gentiles” from Babylon the Great to mystery, Babylon the Great, the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth, and Satan’s incarnation. “And he [the Dragon, having temporarily disappeared following his wounding as the beast of Imperial Rome now] stood upon the sand of the sea [in his new incarnation subservient to the woman or Judaeo-Roman church, which he will ultimately destroy]. And I saw a beast rise up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his horns ten crowns, and upon his heads the names of blasphemy.” This beast is the Holy Roman Empire of Papal Rome because the crowns are on the ten horns or kingdoms into which Imperial Rome divided (Revelation 17:12-17; Daniel 2). These will give their power and authority to the beast confirming a covenant with the usurers to refinance the US dollar with gold backing and preserve Judaeo-Roman dominion, democracy (sic) and Jewish paper wealth from Judaeo-Communism. Brother Branham prophesied, “This nation is going to be busted . . . If we’re living off of taxes, due bills for forty years from now, where are we at? There’s only one thing can happen. That’s to call in the currency and pay off the bonds; and we can’t do it. Wall Street owns them, and Wall Street’s controlled by the Jews; the rest of it’s in the Vatican, and the Jews has got the rest of it in Wall Street with the commerce of the world” (The Revelation of the Seven Seals, p. 168:5).

Our Bible type is found in Genesis 32-33 where Jacob was returning to the Land of the Covenant, fearful lest brother Esau should “smite me, and the mother with the children.” And Jacob wrestled with God in the flesh of a created Man, who advised him how to proceed and changed his name to Israel. Dividing his handmaids and their children, and his wives and their children with their livestock, Jacob passed over before them, bowing himself to the ground seven times, a type of the times of the Gentiles, 2,520 years (Leviticus 26:18; Hosea 6:1-3; Luke 21:24; Romans 11:25), until he came near to his brother. He could not buy Esau’s favour for he had need of nothing, and the usurers will be unable to buy Rome’s favour and will confirm the covenant of Daniel 9:27 as Jacob and Esau reached an agreement. Jacob represents the 144,000 elect Israelites returning to the Land of the Covenant for redemption in “the time of Jacob’s trouble.” In the midst of Daniel’s Seventieth Week their two witnesses will be martyred and the nation will be delivered at the end of the second half of the Week (Isaiah 13; 34; Daniel 12:1). Esau, who swore to kill Jacob (Genesis 27:39-41), types the non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews, physical Serpent’s seed whose names were never in the genealogy of Adam’s race, and apostate Gentiles whose names have been removed.

Politically the revived Roman Empire will be NATO. When Rome breaks her covenant and takes the money-power away from Jewry the Black Nobility will ally Judaeo-Communist Russia against the Judaeo-Roman Universal Church and the united States. Russia will “make Vatican City State desolate and naked, and eat her flesh and burn her with [nuclear] fire” (Leviticus 21:9; Revelation 17:16; 18:4-20), and annihilate the united States.

The “seven heads are seven mountains on which Rome sits, and they are seven kings: five have fallen, one is, and the other has not yet come; when he comes he must remain a short space.” Of these seven Roman emperors, Julius Caesar, Augustus, Tiberius, Caligula and Claudius had fallen; Nero (the last relative of the Caesars under whose reign Vespasian commenced the siege of Jerusalem as prophesied in Ezekiel 9 and Matthew 24:1-3a, 15-21) was ruling at the start of the Ephesian Church Age when John was writing—“and one was yet to come”—Galba (who reigned seven months and six days). These seven deified Roman emperors owned “the names of blasphemy” (William Branham, The Mark of the Beast, p. 34:253-256; The Revelation of the Seven Seals, p. 219:2-6).

“And the beast that was, and is not, is himself an eighth [deified ruler of Rome], and is of the seven, and goes into perdition” (Revelation 17:11; 6:8; 19:20; 20:10). Under apostolic succession when one pope dies another pope ascends Satan’s throne. When “he who weakened the nations is cut down to earth” Lucifer himself will incarnate the last pope as the eighth deified man ruling “all the kingdoms of the world and the glory of them” (Revelation 2:13; Matthew 4:8). “As he said in his heart, I will ascend to heaven; I will raise my throne above the stars of God: I will sit on the mount of the congregation in the sides of the north; I will be like the most High” (Isaiah 14:12-14).

In scripture a beast signifies a power; the Greek word ‘therion’ means a ferocious untamed beast, usually a brutal, bestial man. The beast in Revelation 11 is Papal Rome; in Revelation 13 it is both Papal Rome and her (once) Protestant US image. Verses 11-18 prophesy the destiny of the united States. In this image will be found all the wickedness of the beast that was before it. “As the beast rose at the Nicene Council, her image will come out of the World Council of Churches with all ungodly and satanic power to vent the anger of the Devil upon the true vine of God. It will be a repeat performance of all diabolical cunning and cruelty” (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 132; Revelation 13:15-18). In Revelation 17 the beast is Papal Rome and the united States consolidated—fulfilling the sixth vision of Brother Branham’s apocalypse.

Revelation 13:4-10 is set in the first half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week. No one can make war with the beast because, having refinanced the US dollar with gold backing she holds the wealth of the world. Papal power will increase so no one can war against him. His mouth as the mouth of a lion speaks arrogant words and blasphemies—“teaching for doctrine the commandments of men, heady, high-minded, having a form of godliness but denying the power thereof.” He blasphemes the Name of God by changing it to Titles and refusing correction, and he blasphemes departed saints such as Mary, Peter and Jude, making them intercessors. And power is given him to continue forty and two months (Daniel 7:25; 12:7; Revelation 11:2; 12:14). And it was given to him to make war with the living saints, and to overcome them, torturing and killing the true believer in the Name of the Lord for refusing Judaeo-Roman dogma (Daniel 12:5-7; Revelation 13:15; 14:9, 11).

“The beast that rose up out of the sea” represents the sum of historical worldly political antichristianity as embraced in the corrupt Christianity of its final consummate appearance as Papal Rome—so, likewise, “the woman,” contrasted with the “beast,” is the whole Kingdom of God which divides into the two forms of the “Harlot” and the “Bride” of Christ. Thus in Revelation 17:3 we read, “So he carried me away in spirit into a wilderness: and I saw a woman [the Judaeo-Roman Universal Church] sitting upon a scarlet wild-beast, full of blasphemous names, having seven heads and ten horns.” She sits on many waters or nationalities; world leaders have committed spiritual fornication [idolatry] with her and the inhabitants of earth have been made drunk with the psychology of her fornication as the Israelites were blotted from the Book of Life by Talmudic psychology (Isaiah 9:15-16; Revelation 12:4). She is “the mother of harlots and abominations of the earth.” Earthly states and cultures have been seduced from the true God to serve false gods in company and connection with her. Through her subservient image “all who dwell on the earth whose name has not been written in the Book of Life of the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world will be forced to worship the beast” (Revelation 13:8, 15-18).

Brother Branham, the angel with the Seventh Vial revealed these mysteries to John who types Christ’s end-time Bride (Revelation 17:1). He said, “Right now the churches are controlling politics and at the opportune time will manifest exactly how great is that control. This ecumenical move will end up with Rome at the head even though the people did not envision it that way. This is so because in Revelation 17:3-6 it states that the whore, Mystery Babylon is seated on the beast. She is controlling the last, or fourth empire. This Roman Church is doing that. With the world church system under her Rome will be controlling, and this image (church system) will be obedient to Rome because Rome controls the gold of the world” (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 376:1).

Like the fourth beast of Daniel 7, the beast of Revelation 13 is a compound of the variegated colours of the Leopard (Greece), the ursine feet of the Medo-Persian bear, and the mouth of the Babylonian lion with the monstrous addition of seven heads. So the condemnations and blessings in the letters to the angels of the Seven Church Ages are cumulative. Revelation 3:10, “Because you have kept the Word of My patience, I also will keep you from the hour of temptation, which shall come upon all the world, to try them that dwell upon the earth.” This temptation is exactly like the temptation in Eden, seducing the woman, the remnant church. It will be a very inviting proposition held up in direct opposition to God’s commanded Word, and yet from the standpoint of human reasoning it will be so very right, so enlightening and life-giving as to fool the world.”

“Only the very elect will not be fooled. The temptation will come as follows. The ecumenical move that has started on what seems such a beautiful and blessed principle (fulfilling Christ’s prayer that we all might be one) becomes so strong politically that she bears pressure upon the government to cause all to join with her either directly or through adherence to principles enacted into law so that no people will be recognized as actual churches unless under direct or indirect domination of this council. Little groups will lose charters, privileges, etc., until they lose all property and spiritual rights with the people.”

Already there is a boycott. When I visited the Penitentiary in Marion, Ohio, each month I had to enter on the coat tails of Gideons International because we are not a denomination: similar restrictions apply in Australia. A Christian Museum has opened in Washington D.C. to pressure government to restore America to the faith of the founding fathers. (I doubt this Museum will feature the real holocaust of Christians by Jews in Cyprus, Dresden, Nagasaki or Russia and scores of millions of Christians tortured and martyred by their Roman Catholic church). Based on past reputation they think God will save America when the 1956 jubilee of the Azusa Street revival was her last opportunity for national repentance. God did not respect Israel for what they had been in the past, He damned them for what they were in the present (II Chronicles 7:14). The united States has been weighed in the balance and found wanting. America is doomed. When the state sells out to the church as signified in Revelation 13:11, church and state will be united contrary to the fathers.

As this move becomes the “IMAGE ERECTED TO THE BEAST,” the saints will be gone in the rapture. And this delightful, winsome movement that started out in fellowship at Ephesus where Christians endured “and put to the test those who say they are apostles, and are not, and found to be liars” causing the true Church to “fall from its first love” (Revelation 2:1-7), “ecumenism will become the monster of Satan that defiles and deceives the whole world. For the church system of the Roman Catholic and the Protestant in coming together will control the whole wealth of the world system and force the whole earth into its religious trap, or will kill them, by refusing them the privilege of buying and selling whereby they would make a living. This will be accomplished simply, for the harlot’s daughters are all but gone back to her. In the meantime, Rome has acquired nearly all the supplies of gold. The Jews have the bonds and all the paper. At the right time, the harlot will destroy the present day money system by calling in all the paper, and demanding gold. With no gold, the system falls. The Jews will be trapped and come into the alliance, and the harlot church will take over the world” (ibid, p. 313:2; 314:1).

The united States is the only beast that rose out of the relatively unpopulated earth, all of the other beasts rose up out of the sea; thickness and multitudes of people. Christ incarnates Himself by justification by grace through faith, sanctification, and the baptism with the Holy Spirit. He will come with the clouds of heaven (Daniel 7:13).

Brother Branham explained, “Satan has incarnate himself from antichrist to false prophet now, and in the days of the Jew [when most Christians were Israelites, he] was antichrist amongst the early Church. In the Dark Ages he become a false prophet to the world. See her there with her cup of iniquity. Now, that’s to the Church Age.”

“Now, but in the age after the Church goes Home, he becomes a beast. He becomes the Devil incarnate, the Red Dragon himself. Oh, my. Can’t you see what I mean? He’s incarnate in his people then. He’s got his people bound by his power. The false prophet has prophesied them right into it, give them over to strong delusions to believe a lie and be damned by it, denying the Word with a form of godliness.”

“God works His place in a trinity: justification, sanctification and incarnates Himself in His people with the baptism of the Holy Ghost. Same thing. The Devil’s just in a type after Christ. Oh, Satan incarnates himself . . . And when Satan become incarnate into his church, if there be a Devil, then they are the ones that does the murdering and killing and so forth, because Satan is a killer in the first place, a liar and a thief” (The Revelation of the Seven Seals, p. 204:3-4, 205:4; Revelation 13:15-18; John 8:44).

We are living in the parenthesis between the Sixth and Seventh Vials (Revelation 16:13-16). As Brother Branham explained “Three unclean spirits like frogs went out of the mouth of someone.” A trinity of spirits! A trinity of frogs! A frog is an animal that always looks backward. He never looks where he’s going; he looks where he’s come from. See? Don’t you see? Where was trinitarianism born at? Remember, three unclean spirits,” individual spirits . . . Notice, they look back to the Nicaea Council where the trinity doctrine was born at, not in the Bible. There’s no such a thing. They look back to the Nicaea Council at Nicaea, Rome, where the trinity was born at.

“Notice where they come from. Notice. And the trinity of frogs came out of an old [Babylonian] trinity, give birth to a new trinity, their mother [MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT,THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH]. What’d it come out of? A trinity, “the dragon,” see, “the beast,” and “the false prophet.” A trinity, new. For when were these frogs come out? When did it? Notice, they was there all the time, but it wasn’t manifested until between the Sixth and Seventh Vial, just before the Seals opened to reveal it.

“For in the Message of the seventh angel, the mysteries of God would be known,” all these trinitarian things, and false baptisms, and everything was to be made manifest. God help us to see what’s Truth! . . . Notice, a trinity! “The dragon,” how many knows what the dragon was? It was Rome. “And the dragon stood before the woman to devour her child as soon as it was born.” That right? What does “beast” mean in the Bible? Power. All right. “False prophet, a false prophet,” a false, anointed one. See?

Started where? This is “false prophet,” singular. “False prophet,” the first pope; and from there come out “the whore, and the mother of harlots,” the whole thing.

A false trinity was rising; not in the early days, wouldn’t be made manifest in the early days, it went right on through with it. But when the Seven Seals be come, and opened those mysteries and revealed them; that’s when “the frogs, three unclean spirits like frogs, come out to manifest themselves,” a trinity doctrine against the Truth. See? Huh!

See where it come from? See where it’s going back to? Ecumenical Council. They’re all brothers, anyhow; same spirits, same thing. And watch. So deceiving, performing miracles! And these are devils that go forth to all the gods of the earth, working miracles, to deceive them in the last day, and will succeed in doing it. What did God say about that evil spirit?

Said, “I’ll go down and get in the mouth of those prophets and cause them to prophesy a lie, to cause Ahab to come out there to be destroyed.”

God said, “Go. You will succeed. You will get them to believe it. They’re not on that Word, to begin with.” See? “Go, for you will persuade him. You’ll be the one will do it, when you get in them false prophets, ’cause he’s relying right on them. And he don’t know nothing about the Word, neither will he try to learn about It. He can’t do it, because he’s a thistle, to begin with.” See? See? “You’ll succeed” (II Chronicles 18:19-22).

Look here at these false frogs, looking back, “Why, you know what they said back there at Nicaea?”

I don’t care what they said about, there at Nicaea. I’m saying what they said up here at the Throne of God; what would be, not what was; what will be, for He is “I AM.” See?

“False.” Look at that. Huh! Notice where they come from.

Now listen closely. We see plainly, after the Seven Seals has been opened, that’s to reveal that mystery. What is that trinity? See? Where was it ever called trinity? See? Where in the Bible did It even speak the word trinity? Where could there be three Gods, that we worship three Gods and not be heathens?

How can they be separate, when He said, “I and My Father are One”? “Except you believe that I am He, you’ll perish in your sin, see, your unbelief.” Sin is unbelief. “You’ll perish in your unbelief” (The Anointed Ones at the End Time, p. 51:236-247).

Revelation 16:15-16 places the “silence in heaven about the space of about half an hour” of Revelation 8:1 in real time, commencing with the opening of the Seven Seals and Christ’s unrecognized second or (Gk.) ‘parousia’ Coming “as a thief in the night” on March 8, 1963 (Revelation 10:1-7; 3:3; I Thessalonians 5:2; II Peter 3:10) until the Seventh Trumpet announces the end of the Christian dispensation and calls the first resurrection, the manifestation of the Sons of God, and our translation. This is also the unrecognized threefold PROCESS of the secret, sudden rapture of Christ’s end-time Bride by revelation of the “shout and the Voice of the Archangel” which has been ongoing for fifty-four years yet the world church system has neither understanding nor interest (Matthew 25:6; I Thessalonians 4:14-16; Jude 14).

Revelation 16:15-16, “Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watches, and keeps his garments that he walk not naked [like the Laodiceans Revelation 3:17)], and they see his shame.” We are to be clothed in the righteous acts of saints displaying the Token of the life of Christ by revelation of the end-time Message. “And the [three spirits like frogs] gathered the kings of the earth and of the whole world together into a place called in the Hebrew tongue Armageddon”.

Jesus prophesied that between the Sixth and Seventh Vials in the days of the fourth Gentile world power, three unclean spirits like frogs would look behind themselves as these unclean creatures do, yearning for the past “glories” of the Imperial and Holy Roman Empires, for these unclean spirits called Fascism, Nazism and Communism come out of the mouth of the Dragon, and out of the mouth of the beast, and out of the mouth of the false prophet (Revelation 16:13-16) to gather the world to Armageddon. Brother Branham said these three isms will be subsumed into Communism, while all false religions will become subject to Catholicism. Jesus promised His second or ‘parousia’ Coming “as a thief” would take place towards the end of this period, when East and West are trying to reach an accommodation through the United Nations. This meeting took place in 1960 (Daniel 2:40-45).

Brother Branham said, “I sincerely believe and maintain as a private student of the Word, along with divine inspiration that 1977 ought to terminate the world systems and usher in the millennium” (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 322:4). The world monetary system set up at Bretton Woods died before 1977 when President Richard Nixon unilaterally closed the gold window in 1971, rendering the Bretton Woods system inoperable, so that by 1973 it was replaced by a de facto regime of floating fiat currencies that remains in place to the present day. (See Newsletters 926, 940, and 959).

Notice the god of this world is money. Rome has, or controls the gold, and Jews have the paper, laws, regulations, the Babylonian fractional reserve fiat money system of usury. I Timothy 6:10, “For the love of money is the root of all evil: which while some coveted after, they have erred from the faith, and pierced themselves through with many sorrows”.

The world church system also ended in the early to mid-seventies when the revelation of Brother Branham’s Message began to open to Christ’s end-time Bride, causing her to separate from the Laodiceans (Matthew 25:6; I Thessalonians 4:16; Revelation 18:4). It is the early or teaching rain of Brother Branham’s end-time Message during the silence in heaven the space of about half an hour that ushers us in to the millennium following the Wedding Supper of the Lamb in the sky.

Verse 10, “He that leads into captivity will go into captivity: he that kills with the sword must be killed with the sword. Here is the endurance and the faith of the 144,000 Israelite saints” (Matthew 24:13). Revelation 13:11, “I saw another savage beast (Gk.) ‘therion’ coming up out of the earth; and he had two horns like a lamb[representing Christianity, but soon], he spoke as a dragon [and that is Rome].” Persecuted Christians left Europe for a better life in the New World. The Pilgrim Fathers landed in America seeking religious liberty. They brought the Bible with them. Those who founded the Protestant United States based their Constitution on two great principles, civil and religious liberty.

This beast was the American buffalo whose two horns signified the independence of church and state powers and the absence of an establishment or state religion. America did not rise to power by overthrowing another empire, but by quietly matured espousing friendship with all nations but alliances with none. However once she was established she fixed her destiny by speaking like the beast she sought to escape.

“And the united States exercises all the power of the first beast in his presence, and causes the earth and those who dwell in it to worship the first beast, whose fatal wound was healed [when Constantine began transforming Imperial Rome to Papal Rome].” So don’t you see, Roman denomination, a marked Protestant denomination, an image unto the beast, making a power that’ll force all Protestants like a union . . . persons like ourselves, we’re going to be cut out of all that altogether. That’s exactly, because they won’t be able to do it. It’s tightening; and then when that time comes, and the press comes to a place to where you’re pressed out, then watch (what I am fixing to tell you in a few minutes) watch the third pull then. It’ll be absolutely to the total lost, but it will be for the Bride and the church” (Look Away to Jesus, p. 5:37-49).

“Let me say this, if you count me a fanatic from this night on. That very same thing that I’m speaking of will be done. There’ll be a power put into the Church, and now is coming in, that the Holy Spirit will so anoint the people, till they’ll speak the Word and it’ll create itself right there. We haven’t seen powers like’s coming into the Church now. I know it for a fact.”

“Say unto this mountain be moved. Don’t doubt in your heart, but believe that what you’ve said shall come to pass, you can have what you have said.” The placing of the Church in position, where the fullness of the power of the Holy Ghost comes into the Church. Then critics’ mouths will be shut. It’ll be a short time. Jesus come right off the mountain, went straight to Calvary. Notice, it won’t last long, but it’ll be here”  (Hear Ye Him, #60-0313).

“And he does great wonders, so that he makes fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men [the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki], and deceives them that dwell on the earth by means of those miracles which he had power to do in the sight of the beast; saying to them that dwell on the earth, that they should make a [Protestant] image to the beast, which had the wound by a sword, and did live. [The beast spreads his influence through the image built for him—a worldwide ecumenical council]. And [as Papal Rome] he had power to give life to the image of the beast [ecumenical council of Churches in federation with Rome], that the image of the beast should both speak, and cause that as many as would not worship the image of the beast should be killed. And he causes all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand [indicating servitude], or in their foreheads [accepting trinitarianism which all religions observe knowingly or in ignorance]: and that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name [VICARIVS FILII DEI which means substitute for Christ or in place of the Holy Spirit]. Here is wisdom. Let he who has understanding count the number of the beast [5 + 1 + 100 + 1 + 5 + 1 + 50 + 1 + 1 + 500 + 1 = 666] for it is the number of a man [the Pope]; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six”. nl1000.htm

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers’ tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers’ Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers’ Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe click Unsubscribe click

The Balfour Declaration and its Cost in Lives

November 8, 2017

Bible Believers’ Newsletter 999

“We focus on the present Truth — what Jesus is doing now. . .”
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; we are so pleased to have your company in fellowship around God’s unchanging Word.

Android PhonePlease welcome contributing author Andrew S. MacGregor whose incisive inquiry “The Balfour Declaration and its Cost in Lives” reveals that many who have been elevated for our adulation were Machiavellian traitors “at enmity” with God and man (Genesis 3:15). It exposes the tangled web of “those who say they are Jews, and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan” (Revelation 2:9), and those dedicated to self and the globalist agenda Lucifer espoused in the Talmud and Matthew 4:8-9, who say nothing but are the synagogue of Satan. This week marks the centenary of the infamous Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917.

In consequence of the Balfour Declaration, once great Britain—ruled by Jewry since her conquest is 1688—solemnly promised to a second [non-existent] nation, the country of a third. June 2017 marked the fiftieth year of faux Israel’s occupation of the Palestinian territory—the West Bank, including East Jerusalem, and Gaza—the longest-running military occupation in the modern world. Indian authoress Arundhati Roy has described the perpetual crisis in Palestine as one of “imperial Britain’s festering, blood-drenched gifts to the modern world” (“Come September,” in War Talk. Cambridge, MA: South End Press, 2003, p. 54).

Not only are the lands of Semitic Palestinians occupied by non-Semitic, anti-Semitic strangers (Heb.) ‘Zuwr’ and ‘Nokriy’ but the lands of the Semitic children of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob/Israel are so occupied. (Contrast the pale-face Khazar Israelis like Mr. Netanyahu with the olive complexion of their Semitic neighbours, for example the Dönmeh Jew Saudi royals)! Illuminus Albert Pike’s 1871 Luciferian plan for world conquest and globalism is in its final stages, but Zechariah 14:2, Matthew 24:29-31, Luke 21:25-33 and Revelation 12:7-9 are near to hand. And Richard Nikolaus Coudenhove-Kalergi’s genocidal fantasy of miscegenation “as it was in the days of Noah, a global repetition of the ‘original sin’ (Matthew 24:37; Genesis 3:15; 6:1-3), now called multiculturalism and applauded by the best politicians money can buy, and apostate clergy is well-advanced.

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott

‘Explosive’ Leaked Secret Israeli Cable Confirms Israeli-Saudi Coordination to provoke War

Occult Zionist Flag

November 7, 2017 — Israeli Channel 10 news published a leaked diplomatic cable . . . to all Israeli ambassadors throughout the world concerning the chaotic events . . . which began with Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri’s unexpected resignation after he was summoned to Riyadh by his Saudi-backers, and led to the Saudis announcing that Lebanon had “declared war” against the kingdom.

The classified embassy cable, written in Hebrew, constitutes the first formal evidence proving that the Saudis and Israelis are deliberately coordinating to escalate the situation in the Middle East. The explosive classified Israeli cable reveals the following:


  • On Sunday, just after Lebanese PM Hariri’s shocking resignation, Israel sent a cable to all of its embassies with the request that its diplomats do everything possible to ramp up diplomatic pressure against Hezbollah and Iran.
  • The cable urged support for Saudi Arabia’s war against Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen.
  • The cable stressed that Iran was engaged in “regional subversion”.
  • Israeli diplomats were urged to appeal to the “highest officials” within their host countries to attempt to expel Hezbollah from Lebanese government and politics.


. . . the anti-Iran and anti-Shia alliance of convenience between the Saudis and Israelis appears to have placed Lebanon in the cross hairs of yet another looming Israeli-Hezbollah war . . . Full story:

Comment: Watch this space: Zechariah 14:2, Matthew 24:29-31, Luke 21:25-33 and Revelation 12:7-9.

Lebanon next in US War on Middle East

October 30, 2017 — US politicians, policymakers and commentators insist that the United States military’s involvement in Syria and Iraq is solely aimed at defeating militants from the [CIA/Pentagon recruited, trained, paid, armed and directed] self-titled Islamic State (IS). However, it is abundantly clear that before the Russian intervention in Syria in 2015, the United States was engaged in a proxy war against Damascus, not IS and that as the Russian intervention began rolling IS back and the organization clung to existence, Washington found itself revising its narrative around a new pretext to remain in the region, the “Iranian threat” . . .

Additionally, the US seeks to pursue conflict along yet another familiar axis, through war between Israel and Lebanon and more specifically Hezbollah . . . careful reading and consideration of recent history exposes the editorial as an attempt to create the pretext upon which the US and its allies will provoke this war, not Hezbollah, and not Iran . . . Lebanon has been a battlefield in the past the US has used as a vector toward greater regional conflict . . . Full story:

Comment: With between 200 and 500 thermonuclear weapons and a sophisticated delivery system, Israel has quietly supplanted Britain as the World’s 5th Largest nuclear power, and may currently rival France and China in the size and sophistication of its nuclear arsenal. Although dwarfed by the nuclear arsenals of the US and Russia, each possessing over 10,000 nuclear weapons, Israel nonetheless is a major nuclear power, and should be publically recognized as such . . . Since the Gulf War in 1991, while much attention has been lavished on the threat posed by Iraqi weapons of mass destruction, the major culprit in the region, Israel, has been largely ignored. Possessing chemical and biological weapons, an extremely sophisticated nuclear arsenal, and an aggressive strategy for their actual use, Israel provides the major regional impetus for the development of weapons of mass destruction and represents an acute threat to peace and stability in the Middle East. And this was in 2002!

America’s Debauched Political System. Revelations of Donna Brazile regarding Hillary & DNC

November 7, 2017 — America’s political system . . . too corrupted to fix . . . America is a plutocracy, not a democracy, a cesspool of criminality, inequity and injustice, run by sinister dark forces . . . headquartered on Wall Street . . . [Former acting DNC chair Donna] Brazile . . . feared for her life after the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich . . .

No Russian hacking occurred. Russiagate is a colossal hoax—invented and spread by the CIA under John Brennan . . . Rule in America is all about serving privileged interests exclusively. Democracy is pure fantasy . . . America’s founders rejected it . . . Trump . . . His one redeeming attribute is he’s not Hillary . . . an unindicted war criminal, racketeer, perjurer, belonging in prison . . . Full story:

‘Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map,’ 204 Atomic Bombs against Major Cities, US Nuclear Attack against USSR Planned Prior to End of World War II

Atomic Bomb

November 4, 2017 — As early as September 1945, “the Pentagon had envisaged blowing up the Soviet Union” with a coordinated attack directed against major urban areas. All major cities of the Soviet Union were included in the list of targets. The table below categorizes each city in terms of area in square miles and the number of atomic bombs required to destroy the selected urban areas. Six atomic bombs were to be used to destroy each of the larger cities including Moscow, Leningrad, Tashkent, Kiev, Kharkov, Odessa. The Pentagon estimated that a total of 204 bombs would be required to “Wipe the Soviet Union off the Map.” The targets for a nuclear attack consisted of sixty-six major cities.

It is worth noting that secret documents outlining this diabolical military agenda had been released in September 1945, barely one month after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (6 and 9 August, 1945) and two years before the onset of the Cold War (1947). The secret plan dated September 15, 1945 (two weeks after the surrender of Japan on September 2, 1945 aboard the USS Missouri) had been formulated at an earlier period, namely at the height of World War II, at a time when America and the Soviet Union were allies . . . Stalin was first informed through official channels by Harry Truman of the infamous Manhattan Project at the Potsdam Conference on July 24, 1945 . . . the Manhattan project was launched in 1939, two years prior to America’s entry into World War II in December 1941. The Kremlin was fully aware of the secret Manhattan project as early as 1942.

Were the August 1945 Hiroshima and Nagasaki attacks used by the Pentagon to evaluate the viability of a much larger attack on the Soviet Union consisting of more than 204 atomic bombs? . . . Had the US decided not to develop nuclear weapons for use against the Soviet Union, the nuclear arms race would not have taken place. Neither the Soviet Union nor the People’s Republic of China would have developed nuclear capabilities as a means of deterrence [like North Korea today] . . .

“According to the 1956 Plan, H-Bombs were to be Used Against Priority “Air Power” Targets in the Soviet Union, China, and Eastern Europe. Major Cities in the Soviet Bloc, Including East Berlin, Were High Priorities in “Systematic Destruction” for Atomic Bombings” (William Burr, US Cold War Nuclear Attack Target List of ,1200 Soviet Bloc Cities “From East Germany to China,” National Security Archive Electronic Briefing Book No. 538, December 2015 . . . Full story:

Comment: In a radio address to the American people president Truman concluded, “We thank God that it [nuclear weapons] has come to us, instead of to our enemies; and we pray that He may guide us to use it [nuclear weapons] in His ways and for His [aggressive?] purposes.”

Germany had nuclear technology well beforehand and on moral grounds Hitler resolved not to weaponize it.

One Sunday morning in June, 1933 the Lord showed Brother Branham seven major continuous visions. “The Lord Jesus spoke to me and said that the Coming of the Lord was drawing nigh, but that before He came, seven major events would transpire . . . The last and seventh vision was wherein I heard a most terrible explosion. As I turned to look I saw nothing but debris, craters, and smoke all over the land of America” (An Exposition of the Seven Church Ages, p. 321:2 – 323). You can understand why!

US masses Ships and Aircraft outside North Korea

October 30, 2017 — US war plans are offensive, not defensive, in character. Asked about the possibility of a pre-emptive US attack on North Korea to prevent a hypothetical attack on Seoul, Mattis confirmed, “yes, we do have those options” . . . and South Korean forces are primed for massive offensive strikes against North Korean nuclear, military and industrial facilities as well as “decapitation raids” by special forces to kill its top leaders . . .

The only conclusion that the North Korean regime can reach is that the country confronts the imminent threat of a US military onslaught . . . North Korea has been carrying out mass evacuation drills in cities and towns along the east coast.

The Trump administration is preparing a war not just with conventional weapons, but with nuclear bombs—directed against North Korea and any other powers such as China and Russia that join the conflict. Last week, the Air Force announced that it was preparing to put its B-52 nuclear bombers back on 24-hour alert . . . Trump is being propelled towards launching war as a means of diverting acute social tensions outwards against a foreign enemy . . . Full story:

Comment: During The Second World War the United Kingdom lost 0.94% of its population, France lost 1.35%, China lost 1.89% and the US lost 0.32%. [The Soviet Union lost 26 million people during World War II]. During the Korean war, North Korea lost 30% of its population (

Australia’s Unnecessary Wars

October 16, 2017 — Australian governments find it easy to go to war—that’s Professor Henry Reynolds’ assessment of the role war plays in our society. In this year’s Brisbane Peace Lecture he says that rather than debate the rationale for the wars we fight, we obsess about our own performance, desperate to prove to our “great and powerful friends” that we “punch above our weight”.

Australia has been at war for 60 of the 78 years since 1939. Full story:

Comment: Presented by Queensland Division of the United Nations Association of Australia on September 21, 2017. Australia fights for the Jews’ City of London and globalism.

Amazon Bans Holocaust Denial, holocausts Thousands of Books

March 11, 2017 — Even books not directly relating to the Holocaust, but pertaining to Jewish affairs during WWII, have been included in the mass ban. Revisionist scholar Germar Rudolf has given a complete list of these books (see below) and it’s highly likely more volumes will be added to this growing list of “forbidden books” in the days ahead . . . Amazon is now the largest internet retailer in the world Full story:

If Hitler Won World War II we’d have a Better, More Just World Today

Adolf Hitler

October, 2011 — Legendary US General George S. Patton realized late in the war that the United States fought the wrong country. Patton felt the US should have sided with Germany to destroy Jewish Bolshevik/Communist USSR. This information comes from Patton’s diary entries, letters he wrote to his wife, and comments he made to military officers and staff.

World War II was incredibly complex. However, in the final analysis, WWII was essentially a war between two competing ideologies: Nationalism -vs- Jewish Internationalism/globalism. Adolf Hitler and his allies fought to preserve the concept of Nationalism, not just for Germans but for all peoples the world over. Nationalism really just means the sovereignty of an ethnic people and the right of such ethnic people/nationalists—within their own bordered country—to self-determination. What is meant by self-determination? Self-determination just means an ethnic people preserving their unique culture & heritage and pursuing their collective goals as a unique people. This applies to any ethnic peoples: Nigerians, Germans, Swedes, Vietnamese, Mexicans, Tibetans, etc.

On the other side of WWII was Jewish (Bolshevik) Internationalism (today we simply call this ‘globalism’). In the 1920’s, 1930’s, and of course during WWII, powerful Jewish Internationalists were fervently advancing the Jewish worldview of eventually eliminating all nations . . . except for a Jewish homeland . . . (what was later to be—after WWII—the nation of Israel in 1948). Today we see that nothing has changed; Jewish Internationalism/globalism still works toward gradually “merging” all peoples of the world (particularly in the Western World) into one globalist system with a global government, global laws, consistent global culture, global bank, global currency, etc. In short, Jewish globalism (i.e., the weakening and eventual elimination of all nations) is the exact opposite of Nationalism (i.e., a world composed of nations . . . specifically, ethnically homogenous and bordered nations). The Allied powers of WWII (led by Roosevelt, Churchill, Stalin, et al) were tools of International Jewry and thus de facto fighting for the Jewish globalist worldview. After the (Jewish run) Allies won WWII in 1945, International Jewish forces were then free to exercise a Jewish ‘Sphere of Influence’ over the greater Western World (and as we see today, increasingly over the rest of the world).

Alternatively, if Hitler had won World War II and then exercised a Nationalist ‘Sphere of Influence’ over the greater Western World, we’d have a more just, fair, and moral Western World today. The rest of the world would have similarly benefited had the Germans been victorious since German influence would have surely spread elsewhere (ideas such as non-usurious banking and strong family oriented culture would likely have spread globally).

Had Hitler won World War II, what would be different in the post war world? A few examples: Full story:

The Balfour Declaration and its Cost in Lives

By Andrew S. MacGregor © 2017 all rights reserved

Prelude: To write this article I have basically used two other articles, mostly “The Washington Report” by John Cornelius, and “Behind the Balfour Declaration” from the ‘Institute for Historical Review’ by Robert John. I have also read the articles Benjamin Freedman Speaks, A Jewish Defector Warns Americaand “Pawns in the Game” by William Guy Carr.

What prompted me to write this article was that the Zionists are celebrating the centenary of the odious Balfour Declaration of the 9th of November 1917 without a skerrick of thought to the deceit, the lies, the treacheries that all combined to require a British government to announce to the world the price the world paid to give a small sect of Jews, the Zionists, their thirty pieces of silver, a ‘Homeland’ in Palestine.

But in this centennial what is happening? Woodrow Wilson won the presidential race in 1916 by promising to keep the boys home and out of the ‘War to end all wars,’ but once the race was won he worked hard to ensure that the American boys would fight and die in Flanders fields.

In 2016, Donald Trump won the presidential race by promising to ‘make America great again,’ and beat the war horse Hillary Clinton, but in the background instead of Louis D. Brandeis and Chaim Weizmann there was Jared Kushner and Bibi Netanyahu (who has said, “Once we squeeze all we can out of the United States, it can dry up and blow away”). Has the prelude to another ‘Great War’ started?

That Odious Deceit, The Balfour Declaration

Chaim Weizmann

The Balfour Declaration was announced to the world on the 9th of November 1917 by Chaim Weizmann (left). When one considers that the ‘Balfour Declaration’ was written as a ‘private letter’ from the British Foreign Secretary, Arthur James Balfour to Lord Walter Rothschild, one would have to question how Mr. Weizmann came into possession of such a private letter; when was the letter written and why was it left to Chaim Weizmann to make the announcement rather than a member of the British War Cabinet, which had made the decision to release the Balfour Declaration?

The answer was ‘politics’, and it was not a decision that the British War Cabinet was prepared to announce to the world as they and their American colleagues had only recently decided on the ‘final draft’ of this very private and personal letter penned on the 2nd of November of 1917.

Once the amount of scrutiny that had been pored over this supposedly ‘private’ letter is realised, then it becomes obvious that this was an extremely obscure method for the British War Cabinet to announce their bribery to the outside world. And Chaim Weizmann was able to demonstrate his superiority over the ‘Assimilationist Jews’.

Portrait of Lord Lionel Walter RothschildArthur James Balfour The events of the time though should also be considered, after all General Allenby’s troops had not yet entered Jerusalem to finalise the capture of Palestine. In fact Lord Allenby declined the news of this letter to be released in Palestine until after the war.

However other events, very close to the heart of most Zionists had already occurred, being the abdication of the Czar of Russia on the 16th of March, Lenin returning to Russia on the 16th of April after Trotsky was arrested and held at Halifax until British Intelligence ordered his release. Then despite the failed uprising on the 16th of April the Czar and his family were transported to Siberia on the 30th of September. And on the 7th of November 1917 the Bolsheviks overthrew the Kerensky Provincial government in Petrograd, two days prior to Chaim Weizmann making his victory speech.

Once it is realised that this Bolshevik revolution had been financed by the Jewish New York Bankers the very same bankers who instigated the American Federal Reserve also under President Woodrow Wilson in 1913, the same bankers who had openly supported Germany up until late 1916, and then switched sides to fully support Britain and the ‘Allies’; then there appear to be connections with the Bolsheviks, the Balfour Declaration and the Russian Zionists, who were in fact a small sect within the Jewish community.

Theodor HerzlThe Jewish dream of ‘Zion’ had been around since 1881 but it wasn’t until Theodore Herzl put it into writing that he and Zionism gained universal importance. Herzl met with the Kaiser in 1902 and was offered German West Africa as a ‘Jewish Homeland’. Britain’s Balfour government via the Minister for the Colonies, Joseph Chamberlain offered British East Africa, later considered the Uganda proposal. In the end both, offers were rejected in the favour of a Jewish Homeland in Palestine.

In 1902 Herzl was invited to appear before the British Royal Commission on Alien Immigration in regards to the number of Jews migrating to Britain.

Between 1881 and 1905, there was an immigration of some 100,000 Eastern Jews. Though cut by the Aliens Bill of the Balfour Government, which became law in the summer of 1905, immigration continued so that by 1914 there was a Jewish population in England of some 300,000. A leader of the fight against the Aliens Bill and against tightening up naturalization regulations in 1903-1904 was the Jew, Winston S. Churchill. Eastern Jews referred to each other as “Litvaks” (Lithuania), “Galizianers” (Galicia), “Polaks,” “Hungarians,” and geographical regions of their ancestral origin, e.g., “Pinskers”; but never by the term Jew. (1)

Herzl also had meetings with the Sultan of Turkey, who had this to say; when offered money for Palestine, the Sultan replied that his people had won their Empire with blood, and owned it. “The Jews may spend their millions. When my Empire is divided, perhaps they will get Palestine for nothing. But only our corpse can be divided. I will never consent to vivisection.” (2)

Where did Herzl obtain the finances to make this offer to the Sultan of Turkey? “In his diary Herzl describes submitting his draft proposals to the Rothschild Family Council, noting: “I bring to the Rothschilds and the big Jews their historical mission. I shall welcome all men of goodwill—we must be united—and crush all those of bad.” (3)

But there is nothing anywhere to suggest that Herzl met with any Rothschild in London, there is only this: in a message to a Jewish conference in London, Herzl wrote “the first moment I entered the Movement my eyes were directed towards England because I saw that by reason of the general situation of things there it was the Archimedean point where the lever could be applied.” Herzl showed his desire for some foothold in England, and also perhaps his respect for London as the world’s financial centre, by causing the Jewish Colonial Trust, which was to be the main financial instrument of his Movement, to be incorporated in 1899 as an English company. (4)

Why would a German Sephardic Jew decide to base his main financial instrument in London? Again, the date of 1899 suggests a visit prior to Herzl’s appearance at the 1902/3 Royal Commission on Immigration. Could Herzl’s decision to use London as his financial centre be based on a covert relationship with Lord Walter Rothschild?

In 1896 Herzl met the Papal Nuncio in Vienna and promised the exclusion of Jerusalem, Bethlehem and Nazareth from the Jewish state. He started a Zionist newspaper, Die Welt, and was delighted to hear from the United States that a group of rabbis headed by Dr. Gustave Gottheil favoured a Zionist movement. All this, in a few months. It was Herzl who created the first Zionist Congress at Basel, Switzerland, 29-31 August 1897. (5)

In 1903, after the offer from the British government via Joseph Chamberlain, Herzl authorized the preparation of a draft scheme for settlement in East Africa. This was prepared by the legal firm of Lloyd George, Roberts and Company, on the instructions of Herzl’s go-between with the British Government, Leopold Greenberg. Herzl urged acceptance of the “Uganda scheme,” favouring it as a temporary refuge, but he was opposed from all sides, and died suddenly of heart failure on 3 July 1904. Herzl’s death rid the Zionists of an “alien,” and he was replaced by David Wolffsohn (the Litvak). (6)

The first thought that crosses my mind after looking at Theodore Herzl’s short life is; would he have survived longer had he not deviated from Rothschild’s plan for Palestine by accepting the British ‘Uganda’ solution?

We have only the slightest of records from Herzl in regards to the Rothschilds, with never a hint of him ever meeting either Baron, but I believe we can safely assume that he did meet with at least the ‘British’ Lord Lionel Walter Rothschild. It should be mentioned that the Rothschilds conducted all of their major operations in the United States through the New York banking house of Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

Again there is mention of Herzl’s meetings with Joseph Chamberlain, who was Arthur James Balfour’s Minister for the Colonies, and Herzl appearing before the British Royal Commission into ‘Alien Immigration’, but never any meeting with Balfour himself, and yet Herzl did have meetings with both the Kaiser and with a papal delegate. This being so, then it is a wonder that Herzl felt so warmly about ‘England’.

The Zionists did business with the Law firm, Lloyd George, Roberts and Co. And thus Herzl would have met the senior partner, David Lloyd George, another keen Zionist, and finally there is never any mention of Herzl meeting with a young Winston S. Churchill who was another very keen Zionist, and who at the time was strongly opposing the reduction of Jewish migration into Britain.

Theodore Herzl was told by the Sultan of Turkey that there was no way that Jewish money could buy Palestine from the Ottoman Empire, thus there was only one other way for Herzl and the Zionists to obtain Palestine and that was by force, by a war with the Ottoman Empire, but who would fight that war for them? There is now only one other aspect to look at.

In the Zionist Congress of 1911, (22 years before Hitler came to power, and three years before World War I), Nordau said, “How dare the smooth talkers, the clever official blabbers, open their mouths and boast of progress . . . Here they hold jubilant peace conferences in which they talk against war . . . But the same righteous governments, who are so nobly, industriously active to establish the eternal peace, are preparing, by their own confession, complete annihilation for six million people, and there is nobody, except the doomed themselves, to raise his voice in protest although this is a worse crime than any war . . .” (7)

What Max Nordau, a Hungarian Jewish physician and author, who delivered a polemic against assimilated Jews, is telling us is that the Europeans were holding ‘Peace Conferences’, but were ignoring the Jews. But if these European countries were ‘ignoring the Jews’ then just exactly how could Max Nordau accuse those very same countries of the ‘annihilation of six million Jews?

Reference to the 6 million is a major key, and that it was up to these ‘suffering Jews’ to bring reprisals to the non-Jew. Once we consider this and the continuous assassinations of royalty and government officials by the Jewish anarchists and terrorists, do we see the destabilising effects wrought by the Russian Jews and their ilk. It is though the mention of the ‘jubilant peace conferences’ that tells us most. The Europeans and the ‘Assimilationist Jews’ did not want war, but Max Nordau and his ilk delighted in it!

There is another phrase that is also extremely telling; “the same righteous governments, who are so nobly, industriously active to establish the eternal peace.” To counter this ‘eternal peace’ there had to be “The war to end all wars!” Then we are told this!

In conversation with a delegate at the First Congress, Litman Rosenthal, Herzl said, “It may be that Turkey will refuse or be unable to understand us. This will not discourage us. We will seek other means to accomplish our end. The Orient question is now the question of the day. Sooner or later it will bring about a conflict among the nations. A European war is imminent. The great European War must come. With my watch in hand do I await this terrible moment. After the great European war is ended the Peace Conference will assemble. We must be ready for that time. We will assuredly be called to this great conference of the nations and we must prove to them the urgent importance of a Zionist solution to the Jewish Question. We must prove to them that the problem of the Orient and Palestine is one with the problem of the Jews—both must be solved together. We must prove to them that the Jewish problem is a world problem and that a world problem must be solved by the world. And the solution must be the return of Palestine to the Jewish people.” [American Jewish News, 7 March 1919]. (8)

Here, in 1919, we have the Zionists specifically Litman Rosenthal, telling us that in 1897, that is the year of the first Zionist Conference in Basel, Switzerland that Herzl was predicting that ‘A European war is imminent’ and this is so wrong. For a start WWI did not start until 17 years later. Secondly, had Herzl believed that a European war was imminent, then why was he running around talking to all the various parties such as the Sultan of Turkey, Pope Pius X and the Roman Catholic Church, the Kaiser, Joseph Chamberlain, and of course the Rothschilds? Finally if this was the case, then why did Herzl adopt the ‘Uganda’ offer of Joseph Chamberlain of the Balfour British government in 1903? This has to be an attempt to rewrite history by the Zionists in 1919, to cover their misdeeds. What we should look at now is the connection with Zionism and Great Britain.

Zionism in England

Chaim Weizmann was born in Motal in Belarus, a part of Russia. In 1892 he moved to Germany to study Chemistry at Darmstadt. In 1894 he moved to Berlin, and in 1897 he moved to Switzerland to the University of Fribourg. In 1901 he was appointed ‘Assistant Lecturer’ at the University of Geneva.

Chaim Weizmann migrated to Britain in 1904 and became a Chemistry lecturer at the University of Manchester, which was in the constituency of Arthur James Balfour, who was the Prime Minister from 1902 to 1905, when he lost the Prime Ministership, and his seat, but regained his seat in a by-election. Balfour was a Zionist with very strong beliefs in the Jewish homeland in Palestine. Another politician who also sought votes in the strongly Jewish areas of Manchester was Winston S. Churchill, and in the background there was David Lloyd George.

Weizmann attended all but the first Zionist Conferences and in 1907 travelled to Palestine to push his beliefs to create the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, all on the wages of a university lecturer. It was the Germans though who were responsible for creating this university as well as Russia in protecting the Jews in Palestine.

Chaim Weizmann had met and became friends with Arthur James Balfour in 1904 as well as Winston S. Churchill and assisted both politicians in their political career by utilising the strong Jewish vote in Manchester. Again the Zionists legal representative in England was the firm Lloyd George, Roberts and Co. And thus there can be little doubt that Weizmann would have met that firm’s senior partner, David Lloyd George, and these three politicians are all strong Zionists. So for ten years these politicians and Chaim Weizmann have a cordial relationship, and that brings us to 1914 and the start of ‘The War to End All Wars’.

With the death of Herzl in 1904 David Wolffsohn replaced Herzl. The Hungarian Jew Max Nordau was another prominent member of the Zionist Council, but it is Chaim Weizmann, the English representative that appears to make all the right decisions. The Zionist Council was based in Berlin, but as Germany was now at war with so many other Zionist countries, a neutral country had to be found.

Influential Zionists outside the Central Powers were anxious for the Zionist movement not to be compromised. Weizmann’s advice was that the central office be moved from Berlin and that the conduct of Zionist affairs during the war should be entrusted to a provisional executive committee for general Zionist affairs in the United States. At a conference in New York on 30 August 1914, this committee was set up under the chairmanship of Louis D. Brandeis, with the British-born Dr. Richard Gottheil and Jacob de Haas, Rabbi Stephen Wise and Felix Frankfurter, among his principal lieutenants. (9)

It is Louis D. Brandeis that is the most interesting of this group. Brandeis had total control of the American President, Woodrow Wilson.

[Woodrow Wilson was described as being “attached to Brandeis by ties of peculiar hardness,” a cryptic reference to the story that Wilson had been blackmailed for $40,000 for some hot love letters he had written to his neighbour’s wife when he was President of Princeton. He did not have the money, and the go-between, Samuel Untermeyer, of the law firm of Guggenheim, Untermeyer & Marshall, said he would provide it if Wilson would appoint to the next vacancy on the Supreme Court a nominee selected by Mr. Untermeyer. The money was paid, the letters returned, and Brandeis had been the nominee.

Wilson had written to the Senate, where opposition to the nominee was strong: “I have known him. I have tested him by seeking his advice upon some of the most difficult and perplexing public questions about which it was necessary for me to form a judgment. When Brandeis had been approved by the Senate, Wilson wrote to Henry Morgenthau: “I never signed any commission with such satisfaction.” “Relief” might have been a more appropriate word. (Behind the Balfour Declaration)]. (10)

England Goes to War

Lord KitchenerWinston S. Churchill

Lord Kitchener, who had left London at 11:30 on the morning of 3 August to return to Egypt after leave, was stopped at Dover and put in charge of the War Office. At the first meeting of the War Council he warned his colleagues of a long struggle which would be won not at sea but on land, for which Britain would have to raise an army of millions of men and maintain them in the field for several years. When the defence of Egypt was discussed at the meeting, Winston Churchill suggested that the ideal method of defending Egypt was to attack the Gallipoli Peninsula which, if successful, would give Britain control of the Dardanelles. History also records that Winston Churchill and Lord Kitchener had quarrelled seriously over military policy during 1914–1916. Lord Kitchener had bitterly opposed Churchill’s idea of sending the Naval Division to Antwerp in 1914. He had also opposed Churchill’s plan to capture the Dardanelles. Both ventures proved to be costly mistakes.

When Churchill insisted that the naval forces attack the Dardanelles alone he notified the enemy of intended strategy. After Churchill had committed the initial blunder the army was ordered to participate. Lord Kitchener’s objections were overruled. His advice was ignored. The allied military forces committed to the assault on the Dardanelles were insufficient in numbers, improperly trained, poorly equipped for such a task, and badly supported both in regard to provisions, medical aid, and reinforcements. They were forced to attack first class troops whose leaders had been alerted to their danger. The allied military and naval forces were required to overcome military and naval obstacles that had not been in existence when Churchill ordered the first naval assault. The Dardanelles campaign was doomed to failure from the start. (11)

What we have to look at here is the ‘Gallipoli Campaign’ itself. The ‘Allied Navy’ bombarded the Gallipoli Peninsula on the 19th of February 1915, thus warning the Turks of the eventual landings and gave the Turks sufficient time to prepare for the British landings that occurred in April.

The first landing at Gallipoli took place at Anzac Cove on the 25th of April 1915, and consisted of the ANZAC troops. The main British force landed at Helles on the 1st of May 1915. Again the ANZACS left Anzac Cove on the 20th of December 1915 and the main British forces left Helles in January 1916.

We should now consider these events and the actual times in regards to the career of Winston Churchill. Churchill resigned from his position as the First Lord of the Admiralty in May of 1915, after the Lusitania sinking on the 7th of May 1915 and Arthur Balfour was then given that position. Churchill then retired from the government in November 1915 supposedly because of his bungling of the Gallipoli campaign. I personally do not accept that part of history.

[I remember in the 1960s reading the story that Churchill was required to set up a ‘Royal Commission.’ He asked one judge to preside over this commission, but the first judge declined. Another judge was asked and accepted the position. After the commission that judge apparently told Churchill, “Don’t you ever do that to me again!” The trouble is I cannot find any evidence of this incident.]

I did though find these comments in regard to Churchill’s arrival at the Western Front:

Churchill at Western Front, WWI

“On the 20th November 1915, two days after arriving in France after just resigning from the government the Rt. Hon. Winston L.S. Churchill was attached to the 2nd Battalion Grenadier Guards.”

“On Monday, 3 January 1916, that Lieutenant Colonel Winston Churchill set off from St. Omer to join the men of the 6th (Service) Battalion, Royal Scots Fusiliers.”

“One officer, F.G. Scott noted Churchill’s arrival as: “A limber filled with Churchill’s luggage much more than the 35 pounds allowed weight. In the rear half we saw a curious contraption: a long bath and boiler for heating the bath water.’

His insistence on the availability of alcohol for officers did seem to increase his popularity (and is probably the reason for his transfer from the 2nd Battalion Grenadier Guards which was a “dry” Regiment!)”

“Constantly rushing off to London when an opportunity arose to do a bit of political lobbying.” “Churchill unashamedly used the military communications system to bring him political gossip from London.” “His next brief experience of wearing a uniform was 16 years later, when he was forced to resign as First Sea Lord of the Admiralty in November 1915 as a result of the Gallipoli caper.”

“The War Diary of the 6 Royal Scots Fusiliers is remarkably restrained and mentions W. S. Churchill only once. In the entry for 7 May 1916, Colonel W. S. Churchill left the Battalion today. Churchill decided that politics was, after all, his first love, and was permitted to leave the army provided that he did not apply for military command again—a stipulation insisted on by the Secretary of State for War, Field Marshall Lord Kitchener.”

So why was Winston Churchill forced to resign from the Asquith government and his position as First Lord of the Admiralty? He didn’t resign his seat though. Forget about the Gallipoli disaster as that debacle was not then completed. How about the RMS Lusitania sinking? More than likely. Why would I suggest this? Because Churchill didn’t go to the Western Front for the fun of it, he went to retain his position in politics. In any Commission that would have called for Churchill to appear as a witness, that summons would not have been served because Churchill was ‘fighting’ at the Western Front!

And then after the Commission hearing, after his ‘retiring’ from the Royal Scots Fusiliers on the 7th of May 1916, Churchill resumed his political career. Just a fortnight after Churchill took command of the 6th Royal Scots Fusiliers, on the 18th of January 1916, the last of the English ‘lads’ (Royal Marines) were leaving ‘Helles’ on the Gallipoli Peninsula, and thus we know that Churchill’s sojourn at the Western Front had nothing to do with the ‘Gallipoli Campaign’ but with saving his political career.

[In Trial and Error Weizmann states that in March 1916 he was summoned to the British admiralty in connection with a chemical process he had developed and was subsequently brought into the presence of “the First Lord of the Admiralty, who was at that time Mr. Winston Churchill.” (The First Lord of the Admiralty at that time was Arthur James Balfour)]. (11)

But why was Churchill and Co so set upon initiating a campaign at the Dardanelles? We know that the Royal Navy initially attacked Gallipoli on the 19th of February 1915, and we know that it would take time for the Royal Navy to sail to the Dardanelles, and we also realise that there would have been some planning involved, which would suggest that the original planning would have begun in 1914, so it is rather telling to have this:

“On January 28th, 1915, Mr. Asquith, Prime Minister of England wrote in his diary: “I just received from Herbert Samuel a memorandum headed The Future of Palestine . . . He thinks we might plant in this territory about three or four million European Jews.” (12)

In other words the British Zionists were rather presumptive! But for the British themselves worse was to follow.

Once we read of the ‘disagreements’ between the subaltern Churchill and the Field Marshall Kitchener, especially over the Antwerp and Gallipoli campaigns, and then the ‘stipulation’ Kitchener put on Churchill’s retirement from the 6th RSF one could be forgiven in thinking that there may have been some ‘animosity’ between the two men. Even so, for Churchill to have had his way in overriding Kitchener in the War Office, he must have had some serious support such as Balfour and Lloyd George as well as the Prime Minister. The problem for these politicians was just how could they get rid of Lord Kitchener?

The British Government was aware of the serious conditions brewing in regard to Russia. This is proved by the fact that the matter was discussed by the cabinet and a decision was reached to send Lord Kitchener to Russia for the purpose of re-organizing the Russian military forces. Lord Kitchener sailed from Scapa Flow aboard the H.M.S. Hampshire. She was mysteriously sunk during the night of June 5th, 1916. Lord Kitchener was lost with all but a dozen of the crew. (13)

The British Government announced H.M.S. Hampshire was sunk by a German U-boat or a German mine. This has been proved to be a lie. General Erich Von Ludendorff (who was Chief of Staff and shared with General Hindenburg the leadership of Germany’s military might), also studied the circumstances surrounding the loss of H.M.S. Hampshire and Lord Kitchener’s death. He states positively “Action by German naval units, either U-boats or mine-layers, had nothing to do with the sinking of the ship.” (14)

The port of Scapa Flow was in the Orkney Islands. H.M.S. Hampshire sunk off the Orkneys with the sole lifeboat coming ashore on the Orkney Islands. No German submarine would have ventured so close to the main naval port and even if the Germans had laid mines in the vicinity they would have been detected and removed. Thus the explosion that sunk HMS Hampshire had to come from within the ship itself and that would not have been an accident.

But worse was to happen for the British war effort. The Battle of the Somme started on the 1st of July 1916, and that was the worst of any disaster previously. The Battle of the Somme lasted until November 1916 and the ‘Allies’ lost 650,000 men, while the Germans lost 500,000, and the Western Front was still on French soil.

“Once it became clear, in the fall of 1916, that the battle of the Somme would not result in the German army’s being forced out of France, the British, with their resources approaching exhaustion, had to consider what to do next. Herbert Asquith, who had been prime minister since 1908, had begun, reluctantly, to consider a negotiated peace.” (15)

The British Prime Minister Herbert Asquith had begun to consider a ‘Negotiated Peace’.

1916 was a disastrous year for the Allies. “In the story of the war” wrote Lloyd George, “the end of 1916 found the fortunes of the Allies at their lowest ebb. In the offensives on the western front we had lost three men for every two of the Germans we had put out of action. Over 300,000 British troops were being immobilized for lack of initiative or equipment or both by the Turks in Egypt and Mesopotamia, and for the same reason nearly 400,000 Allied soldiers were for all purposes interned in the malarial plains around Salonika.” (16)

German submarine activity in the Atlantic was formidable; nearly 1½ million tons of merchant shipping had been sunk in 1916 alone. As for paying for the war, the Allies at first had used the huge American debts in Europe to pay for war supplies, but by 1916 the resources of J.P. Morgan and Company, the Allies’ financial and purchasing agents in the United States, were said to be nearly exhausted by increased Allied demands for American credit. (17)

Lord Robert Cecil stated to the British Cabinet: “France is within measurable distance of exhaustion. The political outlook of Italy is menacing. Her finance is tottering. In Russia, there is great discouragement. She has long been on the verge of revolution. Even her man-power seems coming near its limits.” (18)

Half a million Frenchmen were lost in the first four months of war, 1 million lost by the end of 1915, and 5 million by 1918. Who can imagine that the Allies lost 600,000 men in one battle, the Somme, and the British more officers in the first few months than all wars of the previous hundred years put together?

The German losses at Verdun alone were 325,000 killed or wounded.

By this time a soldier in one of the better divisions could count on a maximum of three months’ service without being killed or wounded, and the life expectancy for an officer at the front was down to five months in an ordinary regiment and six weeks in a crack one. The reports reaching England of impending dissolution of the Russian state practically removed the need for Russian endorsement of Zionist aims, but made French and Italian acceptance even more urgent. This at any rate was the belief of Sykes, Balfour, Lloyd George and Winston Churchill. (19)

Lloyd George, an earnest and powerful demagogue, was now prepared to oust Asquith, his chief, by a coup de main. In this manoeuvre he was powerfully aided by the newspaper proprietor Northcliffe, who turned all his publications from The Times downwards to depreciate Asquith, and by the newspaper-owing M.P., Max Aitken (later Lord Beaverbrook).

With public sympathy well prepared, Lloyd George demanded virtual control of war policy. It was intended that Asquith should refuse. He did. Lloyd George resigned. Asquith also resigned to facilitate the reconstruction of the Government. The King then sent for the Conservative leader, Bonar Law, who, as prearranged, advised him to offer the premiership to Lloyd George. Asquith and Grey were out; Lloyd George and Balfour were in. (20)

David Lloyd GeorgeLloyd George then quickly imposed a war dictatorship, and direction of the war was entrusted to a “War Cabinet” of five members, including himself as prime minister and Balfour as foreign minister. Mark Sykes was named secretary. (21)

On Dec. 18, 1916, the American ambassador to Britain conveyed an “offer of peace” on behalf of the Central Powers to the Allies. On the following day, David Lloyd George, in his first speech to Parliament as prime minister, heaped scorn on the peace proposal and vowed that Britain and its allies would fight on until victory.

In retrospect, it seems clear that this speech was a bluff and was meant to goad the Germans into resuming unrestricted submarine warfare. That this was indeed the case is indicated by a series of messages from the U.S. ambassador to Britain, Walter Page, to President Wilson and the secretary of state, written in June 1917. These messages make it clear that Britain was on the verge of financial collapse, and that only American support could avert disaster.” These messages were made public only in 1925 and are, in my opinion, too little known. (The date of June 1917 seems out of place as America entered the war on the side of ‘the Allies in April 1917). (22)

But Lloyd George’s speech was never a bluff. The German ‘Peace Offering’ from Zimmerman came with the promise of no peace then there would be ‘unrestricted submarine warfare’. It is at this time that we must consider the Balfour Declaration in all of its various connotations.

Balfour Declatation

As Arthur Koestler wrote that of the letter; “one nation solemnly promised to a second nation the country of a third.” More than that, the country was still part of the Empire of a fourth, namely Turkey.

In December of 1916 the George Lloyd Cabinet now has four men, Lloyd George, Arthur James Balfour, Winston S. Churchill, and Sykes who are all Zionists and connected to Chaim Weizmann. It is these men who will deliver Palestine to the Zionists! This is the promise that initiates the Jewish New York Bankers to ‘switch sides and now support ‘the Allies’. George Lloyd no longer needs to concern himself about finances; Weizmann and the Zionists have that under control. The Jewish newspapers also switch sides, again for the Zionist’s promise of Israel just as the British newspapers did for Lloyd George.

General Allenby is brought in from the Western Front to replace General Murray of the Egypt Expeditionary Force. Allenby is given all the men he requires to fulfill the taking of Palestine. There can be no possibility of peace until after the taking of Palestine.

There is concern about the possibility of German troops from the Eastern front moving to the Western Front after the collapse of Russia, but this is countered by the introduction of American troops.

Again though, to get the American troops, America has to be brought into the war. This is done by another ‘British’ fake operation, the Zimmerman Telegram.

Arthur Zimmermann Count Johann Heinrich von Bernstorff Count Heinrich von Eckardt

The ‘Zimmermann telegram’

[“We intend to begin on the first of February unrestricted submarine warfare. We shall endeavour in spite of this to keep the United States of America neutral. In the event of this not succeeding, we make Mexico a proposal of alliance on the following basis: make war together, make peace together, generous financial support and an understanding on our part that Mexico is to reconquer the lost territory in Texas, New Mexico, and Arizona. The settlement in detail is left to you. You will inform the President of the above most secretly as soon as the outbreak of war with the United States of America is certain and add the suggestion that he should, on his own initiative, invite Japan to immediate adherence and at the same time mediate between Japan and ourselves. Please call the President’s attention to the fact that the ruthless employment of our submarines now offers the prospect of compelling England in a few months to make peace.” Signed, ZIMMERMANN]

“The texts of the two versions of the ZT, the Berlin-to-Washington (7500) version and the Washington-to-Mexico City (13042) version, were identical, but they had different preambles. The preamble of the 7500 version was “For your Excellency’s personal information and to be forwarded to the Imperial Minister in Mexico by a safe route.” The preamble of the 13042 version was simply “The foreign office telegraphs on January 16.” (From ‘The Washington Report’). (23)

To initiate the ‘Zimmermann Telegram’ hoax, the British must first make preparations to remove any possibility of disclosure.

Admiral Reginald The first change was in the leadership of Room 40, the name given the British codebreaking organization. Room 40 was destined to play a key role in the vast deception to follow, and it was necessary to have a trusted actor at its head. Room 40 was first set up in the fall of 1914 under the direction of Alfred Ewing, who retained that position until October 1916. At that time Ewing was replaced by Captain Reginald ‘Blinker’ Hall, director of naval intelligence. Balfour found a suitable position for Ewing in academia.

Von Jagow was replaced by Arthur Zimmermann, undersecretary for foreign affairs since 1911. Before 1914, Berlin was the centre of Zionist activity, and in 1912 the organization which was to become the Technion, or Israel Institute of Technology, in Haifa had placed itself under the protection of Germany, and Zimmermann had arranged with the Turkish government for the purchase of land and the erection of a building. Zimmermann clearly enjoyed good relations with German Zionists and was thus susceptible to Zionist influence. (24)

(German respect for Jewish goodwill enabled the Constantinople Zionist Agency from December 1914 to use the German diplomatic courier service and telegraphic code for communicating with Berlin and Palestine. On 5 June 1915 Victor Jacobson was received at the German Foreign Office by the Under-Secretary of State (Zimmerman) and regular contact commenced between the Berlin Zionist Executive (Warburg, Hantke and Jacobson) and the German Foreign Office). (25)

[What we must consider here is that ‘The Constantinople Zionist Agency had from December 1914 access to the German diplomatic ‘telegraphic code’ (13042). So just how did the British ‘Room 40’ acquire the two German codes (7500 &13042) used for the ‘Zimmerman Telegram hoax’?] (Wikipedia: At Room 40, Nigel de Grey partially deciphered the telegram by the next day.[7] Room 40 had previously obtained German cipher documents, including the diplomatic cipher 13040 (captured in Mesopotamia), and naval cipher 0075, retrieved from the wrecked cruiser S.M.S. Magdeburg. [9])

We are told that the German Diplomatic cipher 13042 (13040) was ‘captured in Mesopotamia’, or as we know it, Iraq, but the British forces did not take Bagdad until 1918. But what is particularly interesting is that the German naval cipher code 0075, also called code 7500 was retrieved from the S.M.S. Magdeburg by the Russian navy in August 1914.

So here is a question for you! Why would the German Foreign Minister Arthur Zimmerman use a ‘naval code’, that being code 0075 or 7500, to send his ZT to the German Ambassador in Washington? He wouldn’t! Zimmermann was not authorised to use the German navel code, nor would Zimmermann hand a German navel coded message to the American Embassy where it could be used for deciphering purposes.

[From Wikipedia: The British knew that the German Embassy in Washington would relay the message by commercial telegraph, so the Mexican telegraph office would have the ciphertext.]

How could the British know that??? Better still, how would the British get their Ambassador to the correct telegram office in time to buy the ‘Morse Code’ tape of the telegram on the day it was sent? There is no other choice but to accept that the Zimmermann Telegram was a ‘British/American plot’.

Date unknown—What would come to be known as the Zimmermann telegram was concocted in London. My source for this information is a letter to the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, written in response to my first (1997) article, by author Russell Warren Howe.12 Howe stated that he had been taught at Cambridge that the ZT was “concocted in London to encourage Washington to join the Allies against the Central Powers.” My first reaction to this letter was doubt—because Zimmermann subsequently accepted responsibility for the ZT. But of course he had to, because he was responsible, even if the idea came from someone else. Howe states that Britain broke code 7500 (he calls it 0075) “a few weeks before the ZT.” By “broke,” he presumably means “acquired.” (26)

So Russell Warren Howe tells us that the code 7500 was broken by Room 40 just a few weeks before the ZT, but Wikipedia tells us that Room 40 obtained the code from the Russian Navy in 1914. I believe the Wikipedia version for several reasons, the main being that the British would not waste a ‘newly obtained’ code on a subterfuge.

However, it was the German ‘diplomatic code’ that was essential for this false flag, and that could only have been obtained via the German Zionists in Constantinople. Now do you understand why the British Foreign Minister, Arthur Balfour got rid of Alfred Ewing the person in command of ‘Room 40’ and replaced him with Reginald ‘Blinker’ Hall of Naval Intelligence!

[From Wikipedia: However, any doubts as to the authenticity of the telegram were removed by Arthur Zimmermann himself. First at a press conference on 3 March 1917, he told an American journalist, “I cannot deny it. It is true.” Then, on 29 March 1917, Zimmermann gave a speech in which he admitted the telegram was genuine.]

So two days after President Wilson released the ‘English’ version of the ‘Zimmermann telegram’ to the press, an American journalist gets an admission from Zimmermann. But which ‘telegram’ was Zimmermann talking about? Did the American journalist have a copy of the ZT or was Zimmermann actually referring to the coded telegram he sent in regard to the continuation of the submarine warfare?

Did Zimmerman actually accept responsibility for sending the ZT (Zimmerman telegram)? The ZT emanated from the American Embassy in Berlin, and thus it could not have been sent by Zimmerman or any of his staff. The ZT was in code (7500)! President Wilson had only granted permission for the Germans to use the American telegraphic services on the proviso that (1) the telegram was in regard to President Wilson’s ‘Peace negotiations’ and (2) that the telegram was in plain language, not in code! The only person who had the authority to send the ZT was the American Ambassador to Germany James W. Gerard, not Zimmerman!

The Germans had other telegraphic services available to them, including Sweden where ‘coded’ messages had previously been sent directly to the German Embassy in Mexico, so why would the Germans use the ‘American services’ to instigate a war between America and Mexico? Just exactly how many telegrams did Germany send from 1914 to 1916 after the English had severed their cable in the Atlantic? Too numerous to count, but this then brings us to the next question; how many codes did the Germans have?

We know the German Navy had their code, 0075 (7500) which the British had received a copy from the Russians in 1914. That is one code. The German Consulate had their code, 13040 (13042) which the British obtained a copy from Mesopotamia at an unknown date, but they must have had a copy of this code by October 1916. It is fair to say that the German army would also have their own code, but that is not known and not relevant, but what is relevant is that two major German codes were known to the British at the time of the Zimmermann Telegram. So in a normal situation which code would the German Foreign Secretary use to contact his various embassies? Their consulate code 13040 (2) of course.

But this then creates a problem if the message is to be passed on, as two similar telegrams in the same code could allow the code to be broken, and thus other measures would have been taken to ‘protect’ that code. For the British to suggest that one code, code 13040 (2) was less secure than another is not correct; it is misleading, and it is an excuse to explain the use of a ‘foreign’ code, supposedly by the German Consulate. This is why the ‘telegram from Washington to Mexico City was in the ‘correct’ consulate code 13040 and that this was the partially deciphered message that Arthur Balfour gave to Walter Page in February 1917.

To our knowledge, Zimmerman sent one telegram via the American Embassy that was applicable to President Wilson’s Peace Moves; that being the telegram received by The American Ambassador to Britain, Walter Page, which he duly handed over to the British government and PM Lloyd George replied to it in a speech on the 19th of December 1916. “Merry Christmas to all the troops on the Western Front from David Lloyd George”.

British wounded, Bernafray Wood, 19/07/1916 Western Front-1916

Let us consider the ‘trail’ made by the so-called ‘Zimmermann telegram’. This telegram was sent from the American Embassy in Berlin to Washington on the 16th of January, 1917. Since we are not told the actual destination of this telegram in Washington, one must presume that it would have been to the Federal ‘Department of State’.

Once it had reached its destination, the telegram which was sent in Morse Code, would be required to be typed out on the normal ‘telegram form’ and then delivered to its final destination. What does this mean? It means that the ZF which was supposedly in code 7500 would again raise certain questions and again come under scrutiny as it was not in plain language and thus was not approved by President Woodrow Wilson, and yet we are told that the ZF telegram was delivered to the German Embassy in Washington. In actual fact there is no corroboration that the ZT was ever received by the German Embassy.

Three days later, on the 19th of January, the ZT now in the form of code 13042 was sent via telegram to the German Embassy in Mexico City. Again, once the telegram reached its destination a telegraphist would have typed out the telegram from the ‘Morse Code’ into the required code 13042, and then given it to a delivery boy on a bicycle to deliver the telegram to the German Embassy.

So answer this question: Who had control of the telegram from Berlin to Washington and from Washington to Mexico City? Please do not tell me the Germans had control. Nor can you tell me that the British had control.

President Woodrow Wilson is getting the Americans into the War to end all wars.

PresidentWoodrow Wilson Louis D. Brandeis

The author of the ‘Washington Report’ then tells us this and again we must consider very carefully what we are being told.

On Jan. 16, 1917, two telegrams were sent sequentially, by cable, from Foreign Minister Zimmermann, in Berlin, to the German ambassador in Washington, Count Bernstorff. The first, which both Zimmermann and Bernstorff considered to be by far the more important, informed Bernstorff of the decision to resume unrestricted submarine warfare on Feb. 1, 1917, and gave him instructions on when and how to inform the American government. The second was what has come to be known as the Zimmermann telegram. This second telegram was relayed to the German Embassy in Mexico City on Jan. 19, 1917. (27)

What is wrong here? Firstly, the first telegram from Zimmerman to Count Bernstorff is the instructions for Bernstorff in regard to the submarine warfare resumption. This tells us that this telegram had to be in code so that the Americans are not aware of the actions that the Germans are going to take. This also tells us that this telegram could not and would not be sent by Zimmermann via the American Embassy in Berlin, but rather via the Swedish Embassy. Please remember this; America has always been assisting Great Britain in the war effort, and Germany understands this very well, so why would Germany trust the American government? It didn’t, and that is why the Germans sank ships that were carrying American war supplies to Britain.

Secondly, we can now conclude that Count Bernstorff did not receive the ZT telegram. Bernstorff would have become extremely agitated on receipt of the ZT. Why? Because the sending of such a telegram broke every rule and protocol within the diplomatic order.

Zimmermann had no right to use the German navel code! Nor would Zimmermann send to Bernstorff a coded message meant for Heinrich von Eckardt in Mexico City. Not only that but Count Bernstorff would have been well aware that Zimmermann had spent most of his early days in China and would have been very much aware of the ‘Asian Face’! For Mexico to invite Japan to change sides, would represent a major loss of face to the Japanese. Again for Zimmermann to invite Mexico to go to war against America, when Mexico had been siding with America since the first days of the war was ludicrous. Had Count Bernstorff received the ZT, he would have immediately realised that it was phoney; not only that but at the very least the naval code 7500 had been badly compromised!

Again, had the German Ambassador to Mexico, Heinrich von Eckardt seen the ZT, he too would have immediately realised that it was phoney and that the 13042 code had been compromised, and would have immediately contacted both Count Bernstorff and Zimmermann to report the matter.

It gets better! Let us assume that von Eckardt did receive the ZT, and followed the instructions. The instructions stated that Eckardt was only to approach the Mexican President, Venustiano Carranza, once America’s entry into the war was ‘certain’, and thus there is no evidence that Eckardt did in fact approach the Mexican President, however;

[Mexican President Venustiano Carranza assigned a military commission to assess the feasibility of a Mexican takeover of their former territories. The general concluded that it would not be possible or even desirable. (Wikipedia)]

Do you think that the German High Command would not have known that? Do you think the German Ambassador, Heinrich von Eckardt would not have known that? Do you think that Zimmermann would not have known that? Do you think the Reginald ‘Blinker’ Hall and Arthur James Balfour did not know that?

Can you imagine a ‘Foreign Secretary’ being so stupid as to send such a telegram to his Mexican Ambassador? Yet what we have is President Venustiano Carranza reacting to a German proposition he has never received!

Zimmermann had been trying to make peace, not war. It was Zimmermann’s offer to Britain in December 1916 to end the war, but the British had not yet captured Palestine, and so couldn’t afford any ‘peace treaty’. And thus the Zionists would have to vilify Zimmermann!

The author of the ‘Washington Report’ then gives us the following three points: “It should be noted that Zimmermann sent the ZT on his own authority. Neither the Kaiser nor Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg knew anything of it until it was made public in America. After seeing these cables, Bernstorff attempted to have the German government rescind the unrestricted submarine warfare decision, but was unsuccessful.” (28)

Exactly when did the Kaiser and Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg find out about the Zimmermann Telegram, which was released on the 1st of March 1917? When the German Ambassador, Count Bernstorff was stuck on the liner Frederich VIII in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean?

The first point (It should be noted that Zimmermann sent the ZT on his own authority.) is that Zimmermann did not have the authority to incite Mexico to go to war against America. Nor did Zimmermann have the authority to request Mexico to approach Japan with the ludicrous suggestion of changing sides. Zimmermann was a career diplomat of over twenty years and would never have even considered such ‘proposals’. Thus the ZT has to be considered a forgery.

The second point (Neither the Kaiser nor Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg knew anything of it until it was made public in America.) confirms that the ZT was a forgery, as just exactly why would a very senior diplomat even consider inciting two other countries, both Mexico and Japan to change sides in a major war? If the Kaiser and Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg didn’t know of the ZT, then neither did Arthur Zimmermann!

The third point is extremely telling (After seeing these cables, Bernstorff attempted to have the German government rescind the unrestricted submarine warfare decision). What we read here is Count Bernstorff reacting to the cable he has received in regard to the unrestricted submarine warfare decision, but there is not one iota of concern of the ludicrous plot to invite both Mexico and Japan to change sides. Had Count Bernstorff actually received the ZT then he would have reacted extremely loudly and strongly to the ludicrous plan. Count Bernstorff was not aware of the Zimmermann telegram!

What we have at the moment is:


  • 1. The Kaiser was not aware of the Zimmermann telegram.
  • 2. Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg was not aware of the ZT.
  • 3. Count Bernstorff was not aware of the ZT.


  • 4. Ergo, Heinrich von Eckardt could not have been aware of the ZT.

How can I come to such a conclusion? It is easy; Zimmerman did not have the authority to invite another country into the Great War, or to propose that country ask another to swap sides. Had von Eckardt received the ZT then he would have immediately queried the telegram and that would have alerted the Kaiser, Chancellor Bethmann-Hollweg, Count Bernstorff and finally Arthur Zimmermann concerning the British/American plot.

More importantly, it would have also alerted these people to the fact that the diplomatic code 13042 was known to the British and was no longer safe. For the Americans, there is only one more impediment that they have to remove, Count Bernstorff. On the 31st of January, 1917 Count Bernstorff informs the American government that the unrestricted submarine warfare against Britain would resume on the following day as Britain had refused to consider the ‘peace offer’. Please note there is no mention of the British blockade of the German ports.

Three days later America broke off diplomatic ties with Germany and Count Bernstorff was ordered to leave America. As the Washington Report tells us:

Jan. 31, 1917—Bernstorff informed the U.S. government that unrestricted submarine warfare would commence the following day.
Feb. 3, 1917—The U.S. broke off diplomatic relations with Germany, Bernstorff told to leave the U.S.
Feb. 14, 1917—Bernstorff left New York on the Danish steamer Friedrich VIII to return to Germany. Safe conduct had been granted by the British.
Feb. 16, 1917—The Friedrich VIII entered Halifax, Nova Scotia harbor. Bernstorff remained incommunicado for almost two weeks.
Feb. 26, 1917—The State Department received a telegram from the American ambassador in London containing the plain language text of the ZT.
Feb. 27, 1917—Friedrich VIII permitted to sail from Halifax.
March 1, 1917—Text of ZT published in U.S. (29)

Count Bernstorff is the only impediment to the plot to bring America into the ‘Great War’. On the 14th of February Bernstorff leaves America on the Danish steamer, ‘Friedrich VIII, which has been granted ‘safe conduct’ by the British. That however did not stop the British from holding Count Bernstorff in Halifax, Nova Scotia, on the Friedrich VIII until the 27th of February, the day after the State Department receives the ‘English text’ of the ZT.

This holding action ensures that Count Bernstorff is on the high seas when two days later on the 1st of March that President Woodrow Wilson releases the ‘English’ text of the ZT to the American press, the very same press that had a ‘journalist’ obtain a ‘confession’ from Zimmermann two days later again whilst Zimmermann’s alibi, Count Bernstorff was still on the High Seas.

So just what exactly do we have at this stage?

We have the ZT transmitted from the American Embassy on the 16th of January, 1917 in the German naval code 7500, which had come into the British hands from the Russian sinking of the S.M.S. Magdeburg in August 1914. This means that the British had the German naval code which could have been used to locate German submarines off the Irish coast in May 1915 in regards to the sinking of the Lusitania. Again there is absolutely no evidence to even suggest that the German Foreign Minister, Arthur Zimmermann, was the author of this telegram, and in fact there is sufficient evidence to suggest that he could not have been the author.

The ZT arrives in Washington, and is supposedly decoded and then written in the German Diplomatic code 13042 (or 13040) before being sent via the American Telegram system to Mexico City, on the 19th of January 1917, where the British Ambassador, Sir Thomas Hohler was then able to purloin a copy of the telegram. Again, the British ‘Room 40’ had a copy of the cipher supposedly captured in Mesopotamia. From the ‘Washington Report’ we have this:

[Our first book is The Life and Letters of Walter H. Page by Burton J. Hendrick. Walter Page was a long-time (since 1881) friend of President Woodrow Wilson and was appointed by him to be U.S. ambassador to Great Britain, serving from 1913 until his death in 1918.

Hendrick relates that in late February 1917 Balfour personally handed Page a copy of the document which has come to be known as the Zimmermann telegram. It is the version of the telegram that was forwarded by the German Embassy in Washington to the German Embassy in Mexico City on Jan. 19, 1917. Balfour stated that the telegram had not been obtained in Washington but had been bought in Mexico City.

ZT-Hendrick appears nowhere else than in Hendrick’s book. It seems to be something the British gave Page, with an indication that it was an early, partial, decipherment of ZT-2 made sometime before Page was given the completely deciphered version. It is evident, however, that ZT-Hendrick is derived from ZT-1, not ZT-2.] (30)

Had the Zimmermann telegram been factual, then it would have been impossible for the British Ambassador to Mexico, Sir Thomas Hohler to have been able to purloin a copy of the telegram without having full knowledge of the contents of the original telegram. Again that Arthur Balfour handed Walter Page a supposedly partial deciphered copy of the telegram a month after they had supposedly intercepted the telegram is not that important until one realises just exactly where the German Ambassador to America was at that time, stuck on the Friedrich VIII at Halifax. This removes the responsibility of President Woodrow Wilson of having to ask Count Bernstorff about the ZT.

A month later, President Woodrow Wilson puts his proposal to the American Congress that America should declare war against Germany on the 2nd of April 1917. On the 6th of April, Congress passed the motion and America had entered the ‘War to end all wars’.

Prime Minister David Lloyd George moves quickly and brings in General Allenby from the Western Front to replace General Murray of the Egyptian Expeditionary Army, and the move is on to capture Palestine. Then once General Allenby is in Palestine, but before he can capture Jerusalem the Balfour Declaration is announced by Chaim Weizmann on the 6th of November 1917.

Now a person would imagine that the ‘Balfour Declaration’ was a purely British concern, and related solely to correspondence between Lord Walter Rothschild and Arthur James Balfour. So why was it required to be read and approved of by President Wilson’s inner sanctum?

Brandeis was in Washington during the summer of 1917 and conferred with Secretary of State Robert S. Lansing from time to time on Turkish-American relations and the treatment of Jews in Palestine. He busied himself in particular with drafts of what later became the Balfour Declaration and the British Mandate for Palestine, and in obtaining American approval for them. A considerable number of drafts were made in London and transmitted to the United States, through War Office channels, for the use of the American Zionist Political Committee. Some were detailed, but the British Government did not want to commit itself to more than a general statement of principles.

On 18 July, such a statement, approved in the United States, was forwarded by Lord Rothschild to Lord Balfour. It read as follows:

His Majesty’s Government, after considering the aims of the Zionist Organization, accepts the principle of recognizing Palestine as the National Home of the Jewish people and the right of the Jewish people to build up its national life in Palestine under a protectorate to be established at the conclusion of peace following the successful issue of war.

His Majesty’s Government regards as essential for the realization of this principle the grant of internal autonomy to the Jewish nationality in Palestine, freedom of immigration for Jews, and the establishment of a Jewish national colonization corporation for the resettlement and economic development of the country.

The conditions and forms of the internal autonomy and a charter for the Jewish national colonizing corporation should, in the view of His Majesty’s Government, be elaborated in detail, and determined with the representatives of the Zionist Organization.

It seems possible that Balfour would have issued this declaration but strong representatives against it were made directly to the Cabinet by Lucien Wolf, Claude Montefiore Sir Mathew Nathan, Secretary of State for India Edwin Montagu, and other non-Zionist Jews. It was significant they believed that “anti-semites are always very sympathetic to Zionism,” and though they would welcome the establishment in Palestine of a center of Jewish culture, some—like Philip Magnes—feared that a political declaration would antagonize other sections of the population in Palestine, and might result in the Turks dealing with the Jews as they had dealt with the Armenians. The Jewish opposition was too important to ignore, and the preparation of a new draft was commenced. At about this time, Northcliffe and Reading visited Washington and had a discussion with Brandeis at which they undoubtedly discussed Zionism.

Multiple pressures at key points led Lord Robert Cecil to telegraph to Col. E.M. House on 3 September 1917: “We are being pressed here for a declaration of sympathy with the Zionist movement and I should be very grateful if you felt able to ascertain unofficially if the President favours such a declaration.” House, who had performed services relating to Federal Reserve and currency legislation for Jacob W. Schiff and Paul Warburg, and was Wilson’s closest adviser, relayed the message, but a week later Cecil was still without a reply. (31)

Jacob De Haas (1911)Then there is this: (Jacob) De Haas continues:
Then one morning Baron Furness, one of England’s unostentatious representatives, brought to 44 East 23rd Street, at that time headquarters of the Zionist Organization, the final draft ready for issue. The language of the declaration accepted by the English Zionists based as it was on the theory of discontent was unacceptable to me. I informed Justice Brandeis of my views, called in Dr. Schmarya Levin and proceeded to change the text. Then with Dr. Wise, I hurried to Colonel House. By this time he had come to speak of Zionism as “our cause.” Quietly he perused my proposed change, discussed its wisdom and promised to call President Wilson on his private wire and urge the change. He cabled to the British Cabinet. Next day he informed me that the President had approved. I had business that week-end in Boston and it was over the long distance wire that my secretary in New York read to me the final form as repeated by cable from London. It was the text as I had altered it. (32)

So just exactly who was the author of the document that the world knows as ‘The Balfour Declaration’? Was it Arthur James Balfour, Lord Walter Rothschild or possibly the American Zionist Jews, De Haas or Louis D. Brandeis?

The Balfour Declaration was the price paid by not just the British, but the whole world so the British could conquer Palestine and hand it to the Zionist Jews.

It is now legitimate to consider that the First World War, known at the time as “The War to end all wars,” as a primary tool to instigate the British takeover of Palestine, as per the Zionist agenda, and this is supported by the actions of the politician, Winston S. Churchill, not only in his attacks on the Gallipoli Peninsula but also his involvement in the sinking of the Lusitania in 1915.

But even if one does not consider the initial 1914 – 1916 war, there can be no doubt whatsoever that the only impediment in continuing the Great War from 1916 after the German proposal of ‘Peace Treaties’ to end to the war was Zionism, and the British, with the help of Woodrow Wilson, then used subterfuge to bring in the Americans to the great slaughter for the booty called Palestine.

The Hungarian Jew, Max Nordau made comment in 1911 of the suffering 6 million Jews, but never batted an eyelid on the cost of the Great War of 17 million Europeans, but the slaughter didn’t stop at the end of the ‘Great War’, it continued.

The Bolshevik revolution in Russia in 1917 was another Jewish success, but the many revolutions in other European countries including Hungary and Germany up until 1923 were not so successful, but they did cause the Kaiser to abdicate and flee to Holland.

That these smaller revolutions didn’t succeed was secondary, as by the end of the Second World War most of those countries were controlled by the Communists, and as Rabbi Stephen Wise was quoted in 1923, “Some call it communism, but I call it Judaism.” As for the other countries, including America, Britain and its Commonwealth, they were all controlled by another form of Judaism, called Capitalism, and controlled by none other than the Rothschilds.

The final question that now arises is just exactly how were these Zionists so successful? Their first tool was money, but as the Sultan of Turkey stated Palestine was not for sale, so the Zionists had to resort to war. To initiate such a war, the Zionists needed corrupt politicians. They found those corrupt politicians as in Winston Churchill, that most corrupt and easily purchased tool.

young Winston ChurchillWhen Winston Churchill suffered a hard time at the Sandhurst Military College, he cried to his mother Jenny Jerome, the American Jewess, who immediately attacked anybody who her son named. When Winston Churchill finished his studies at Sandhurst and was posted to a ‘cavalry regiment’ with a pretty uniform, he immediately took leave and visited his mother’s friends in New York. When he was told to report to his regiment, he stopped off at a couple of little ‘hot spots’ and reported to the local British military and led a couple of tours, but when the real fighting came as in the Boer War, he bought his commission then worked for his mother’s friends as a journalist.

Arthur James Balfour was another politician, a cousin to Lord Robert Cecil, and nephew to Lord Salisbury who on retiring from the office as Prime Minister in 1902, handed the job to his nephew Arthur. Now normally politicians retired after being voted out of the office of Prime Minister, but good old Arthur stayed in there and continually served the Zionist agenda, even after retiring from office.

David Lloyd George, the Zionists’ solicitor who by stealth removed Herbert Asquith as Prime Minister and then gave his constituents the deadliest Christmas present ever in December 1916 when he refused the peace offerings from Germany. Then there was Herbert Samuels who in 1915 presented his Prime Minister Herbert Asquith with his memorandum on ‘The future of Palestine’ in January of 1915, and finally, Mark Sykes the messenger boy and secretary (who represented Great Britain in the so-called Sykes-Picot negotiations (1915–16) concerning the dismemberment of the Ottoman Empire after World War I).

And finally we have the compromised American President, Woodrow Wilson who was totally controlled by the Zionists via his relationship with Louis D Brandeis, who not only permitted the Jewish ‘Federal Reserve’ to be implemented in 1913, but then against all of his electoral promises had congress declare war on Germany on the 6th of April 1917.

There is one last piece of information that demonstrates the type of ego these corrupt politicians were dealing with; which comes from the American, William Yale.

William Yale*William Yale was a ‘Special Agent of the State Department in the Near East during the First World War. “When I (Robert John) had dinner with him on 12 May 1970 at the Biltmore Hotel in New York, I asked him if Weizmann had told him how the special mission had been aborted. He replied that Weizmann said that the Governor of Gibraltar had held a special banquet in their honour, but at the end all the British officials withdrew discretely, leaving the four Jews alone. “Then,” said Weizmann, “we fixed it.”

Yale said he had a talk with Weizmann “somewhere in the Mediterranean in 1919,” and asked him what might happen if the British did not support a national home for the Jews in Palestine. Weizmann thumped his fist on the table and the teacups jumped, “If they don’t,” he said, “we’ll smash the British Empire as we smashed the Russian Empire.” (Behind the Balfour Declaration) (33)

It doesn’t really matter as Weizmann’s war broke Great Britain, and she was never able to recover from the costs of that ‘Great War’.

Is there any difference between a Jewish Communist, Bolshevik, Fascist or Zionist? I would doubt it as they all seem to display that megalomaniacal desire to destroy.

And now, 100 years after President Woodrow Wilson lied to the American people and then hoodwinked them into the ‘War to end all wars’, we have another President who seems prepared to lead America into the next world war of Zionist desires. What President Trump must consider is the cost that the once ‘Great Britain’ paid for fighting that first Zionist war!

Andrew S. MacGregor   nl999.htm

1-9. Behind the Balfour Declaration by Robert John
10-11. The Washington Report; The hidden history of the Balfour Declaration by John Cornelius
12-14. Pawns in the game by William Guy Carr
15. The Washington Report
16-21. Behind the Balfour Declaration
22-32 The Washington Report
33. Behind the Balfour Declaration

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers’ tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers’ Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers’ Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe click Unsubscribe click


The End-time Seed Sign

November 2, 2017

Bible Believers’ Newsletter 998

“We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . .”
ISSN 1442-8660

Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ; it is good to have your company.

Android PhoneLast week’s Newsletter was a larger than usual and some subscribers must have missed out because we received ‘bounce’ notices from and Les miserables should download Newsletter 997 from our Church Website, and contact or instructing them to “white list” the Church.

Our feature article in this issue is “The End-time Seed Sign.” The words are mainly those of Brother Branham with clarification added in parentheses. Although this Message is simple and straightforward please dwell over the words otherwise you may overlook enlightening nuances.

This week has seen the five hundredth anniversary of October 31, 1517 when the great Martin Luther nailing his famous ninety-five theses to the door of Castle Church and proclaimed, “The just shall live by faith.” Truly if the Lutherans could get back to his teaching and serve God as this gracious brother served Him, then that people would surely be a credit and praise to the great God and Saviour, Jesus Christ.

This week also saw the centenary of the infamous Balfour Declaration of November 2, 1917, wherein “One nation, solemnly promised to a second [non-existent] nation, the country of a third.” But “We know that all things work together for good to those who love the Lord, to them who are called according to His purpose.” Thus non-Semitic, anti-Semitic self-styled Jews have built Jerusalem and its infrastructure for the children of Jacob to occupy as their Jebusite forebears built Jebus or Salem and its infrastructure for the children of Jacob to occupy. The modern state of faux Israel will soon be utterly defeated and after a number of years “the nation of Israel will be born in one day,” and not one so-called Jew will be among their number (Isaiah 24:1-23; 30:19-26; 66:8).

This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.

Your brother-in-Christ
Anthony Grigor-Scott

US DOD plans Solar-Storm-based National Blackout Drill during November Antifa Protests

October 27, 2017 — According to The National Association for Amateur Radio (ARRL), elements of the US Department of Defense (DOD) will simulate a ‘communications interoperability’ training exercise across the United States on November 04-06. The announcement released on October 24 has not been widely distributed to the media, because the drill is simulating a total grid collapse and could spark public fear . . .

The United States government is quietly preparing for a major space-weather event to paralyze communication systems and energy grids across the entire country. As a citizen, you’re not allowed to know this knowledge and frankly you will not be prepared—only the government will be. The writing is on the wall of what is coming through an executive order and DOD drills.

No wonder public trust with government is at historic lows, because you’re not allowed to know the truth. Simultaneously, the wealthiest families who own mega corporations in the United States are plowing millions into their proxy armies called community organizing groups. Let’s just hope, a coronal mass ejection doesn’t occur when these severely misguided folks are protesting. Full story:

Comment: Would it not be strange if Israel or the US were to fire a missile from the Sea of Japan and explode a hydrgen bomb high above the United States that would really damage the power grid. Just like the S.S. Sussex hoax, R.M.S. Lusitania, Pearl Harbour ‘surprise,’ Gulf of Tonkin hoax, Domino theory, 9/11, myriad Marriott and Westfield false flag adventures, 7/7, Port Arthur Massacre, WMD, al Qaeda and other US/NATO mercenary operations and countless false flag/black flag operations worldwide. Might peaceful North Korea not be indicted?

Texans wanting Relief from Hurricane Harvey must Promise not to Boycott Israel

October 19, 2017 — This is a legitimate story: US flood victims in Texas (and elsewhere) must essentially swear fealty to Israel in order to get payments! Victims must pledge to never boycott Israel. Full story:

Big Brother Bombshell Set to Blow

October 20, 2017 — The deep state run by the globalists must initiate the final move to take it all over. News that US legislators have looped in the major internet players in the media war on Putin and Russia only comes as a surprise for those who are just consumers of Facebook, Google, Twitter and Microsoft products and services. For these people, I’ve got breaking news. Your glorious internet freedoms are about to be terminated.

Facebook NSABack in 2007, just before Microsoft funded the fledgling Facebook startup with $240 million dollars, I was one of the early adopters of the platform owing to me job as a technology analyst. For those of you who did not know Microsoft was largely responsible for Facebook usurping every other social community online, I am sure the fact will have some bearing for you where recent developments are concerned. And for those reading who are surprised, I was one of the most read technology analysts in the mid to late 2000s, the fact I tested every major and minor technology hiccup launched from 2005 to 2010 bears mentioning as well. So much for background, I’ll leave off laying out my journalism CV in favour of warning you about the coming debauchery.

When VentureBeat and other technology media warned us in 2014 that Facebook was in bed with the NSA and the FBI, this was a litmus test to see if anybody cared enough to pay attention. Some did, but not enough to raise much of a stink. When we were warned that former President Barack Obama was on board with the NSA and US intelligence agencies defying the US Constitution and spying on citizens, this was an even bigger test that “We the People” failed miserably. Further revelations by whistleblower Edward Snowden were obscured in the news cycle determined to report his “treason” instead of digging further into what he disclosed. As has been the case with Julian Assange and Wiki Leaks these past few years, the deep state owned media and the technocrats have diluted or replaced the truth of their global plan. Fast forward to “fake news,” Trump, and the French elections cycle.

By now we are all familiar with allegations about Vladimir Putin helping shoehorn Donald Trump into the White House. The media and congressional circus over this supersedes any news of the despair in Gaza or Syria or in Donetsk in Ukraine. Between NFL cry babies disrespecting the national anthem and Confederate heroes being defamed, mass shootings in Las Vegas and Napa Valley wildfires, there’s a dull hum of sold out Senators creating a case against liberty itself—freedom of speech and of the press. For my part, I saw it coming about the time the European Union created its own “Truth Ministry” at the behest of some real German Nazis. Then I was assured when Facebook took steps before the French elections to test what I believe is a “truth algorithm” to censor ideas. On the latter instance, there is actually proof on my various PCs and printed out for safekeeping. This aspect will be of interest now, and when my book is published in a couple of weeks . . .
Full story:

How the West Re-colonized China

26 August 2015 — The “Chinese dragon” of the last two decades may be faltering but it is still hailed by many as an economic miracle. Far from a great advance for Chinese workers, however, it is the direct result of a consolidation of power in the hands of a small clique of powerful families, families that have actively collaborated with Western financial oligarchs. Full story:

God did not make Man to be Doctored

William Branham under horizontal rainbow

December 18, 1960 — When God made man, He didn’t make him to be doctored. He had his own doctoring in him. He was equipped. He was a unit of his own. See? Then healing does not come from any outside resource; it has to come from the inside. Now, we can take outside aids, such as to kill germs or whatever it is in us; or we can take our hands and cut on each other, and take a piece out, or something like appendix, or a bad tooth, or something, and take it out. But healing does not come from anything that you apply. Healing only comes by the power that’s within yourself to build back the tissue that’s been torn from the place it’s been taken out. And therefore, healing is in you. Now, listen close, and think hard now before you pass your thought of this. Man in the beginning, when he was made, a man is a god. He’s absolutely a god, for he was made in the image of God, being a son of God, and then he’s an heir of all that God is. And man was given a domain, and the domain was the earth. You have power over the fishes, over the fowls of the air, and over everything. He could just speak, and everything obeyed him, because he was a god within himself: not universal God, but I mean the God of heavens and earth; but he was a ruler in his domain. He was a king, a king-ruler. That was man. And even now in his fallen estate now, he still has the appearance . . .

Now, not long ago, they were trying to interbreed, and so forth, and say that, “Man come from lower animals, and through evolution he brought himself up.” Well, see, they kept fooling around with science till they disproved their own theory.

You cannot interbreed anything and make it go higher; it’ll drop right back. It cannot. Hybrid corn, or anything, cannot breed itself back. Or like I was saying the other day, It’s the donkey and the mare horse can breed and will bring forth a mule, but that mule cannot bring forth another mule. It has to go right back to its begin. Because, God said, “Every seed after its kind”.

And they just found out, recently, that your body is full of light. X-ray proves that. The x-ray does not have any light of its own. It’s your light that it uses. You’re born with four rays. After a little while, say twenty, twenty-five, one ray goes out; and thirty-five, another; or forty, another one goes out; and finally when you get pass about sixty-five, you’re living on your last ray. And every time you take a x-ray picture, you’re tearing them rays down. That’s the reason you don’t have no more . . . and you stick these kids’ feet in them machines, because it was just tearing the rays right out of their little bodies. And that’s cosmic light that’s in you, that you’re made up, full of light cells. Now, that’s cosmic light.

But God is a different Light, but yet He’s Light. Now, I think of the picture there is a great proof of what I’m fixing to say, that God is Light. And when we were walking in Light of God, as sons of God; God’s not cosmic light, but God’s Life operated through the cosmic light of our bodies, our cells. We were absolutely at one time, real genuine sons of God. But then when the fall came . . .

And then where the fruit of the Spirit today is love, joy, faith, long-suffering, meekness, gentleness, patience, all supernatural, it’s just got to a spot to where all the whole body, just so gradual . . .

Like a seaweed you get in the bottom of a sea. And a lot of times, divers, and they’ll get under these seaweeds. And before they know it, they’re wrapped in such a way they can’t get out of it.

Well, that’s the way sin has done the human being. That’s the way coldness has done the church. That’s the way communists has done the nation. It’s so treacherous. And then in the human body, it wrapped us, and is pushing out this Light of God, by denominations, and denying faith, and so forth, it’s pushed out all the rays of God’s great power of faith (See?), that’s in us (that should be). He’s pushed all those rays out in such a place, till we just got to a lodge; and then now below the lodge, the church is, ’cause it’s just pushed all the darkness out. And even just saying it, “It doesn’t happen,” denying that it could happen (See?), the miracles of God.

And yet, the man, somewhere down in him, somewhere in him, if he could only let that little . . . As I illustrated it, like a button. When a man’s saved, that much of him is God. That’s the little Light that comes in to make you quit doing what’s wrong. Now, if you can take all the malice, and envy, and strife, and unbelief out, that little button-like of the Light and power of God will keep growing, growing, growing, growing, crowding out unbelief. And you don’t do it by exhortations of bodily exercise. You do it by a sanctified, consecrated Life, that the Holy Spirit moves through you. I caught some of It in a place, where not long ago . . .

How many ever remembers when Elijah Perry was raised from the dead that morning, some of you over here? You seen it in the paper here, many times. I seen Sister Wilson and them raising their hands. I was standing there when that man died. He lives right out here now, comes to church once in a while, testifies of it.

He had been dead several hours. He died with haemorrhages of the lungs, and he was so bloody all over. And I walked away; I was just a young preacher, those days. And Sister Jackson used to be a member of the church here. And a Methodist preacher’s wife, I forget what that man’s name was now; Shafiner, Brother Shafiner and Sister Shafiner, they were some relation to the Wiseheart’s. And she was standing there at the bedside. And I started to move away. And he was just as bloody as he could be, where he died. And his eyes was turned back, and his throat had bulged out. And they pulled a sheet over his head. And his wife was out there. They were crying, and trying to get addresses to call the loved ones.

And I started to walk away from the bed, and I felt Somebody lay Their hand on me. I thought it was Sister Shafiner. And when I turned, there was nobody around me. And then I started . . . It left me when I turned around.

And Brother Elij’ was laying there dead. We’d been very good buddies, fished on the river, you know how we did so much together. And he got hurt out here, a railroad, riding spider. Well, it mashed his lungs in. He was bleeding; he bled and took TB from it, and died.

I started to move away this way, and then I felt that Hand again. I turned back, It wouldn’t to get off of me. And before I knowed what I was doing, I was laying on top of that man, with my lips against his lips. I was as bloody as he was, laying there on that man, crying out to God. And I felt something come up around the side of my ear; it was his hand.

And you’ve heard him stand right here and testify of it. See? How that he come back to life. And that’s been about twenty-five years ago, or maybe thirty, living today right out here on the curve. And he come here not long ago, was testifying of it in the church.

Now, that’s where Canada called up and wanted to know, one time. I’d testified of it in Canada when I first started my meetings. They called Mr. Coots, the undertaker, and asked if there’d been a man raised out of the parlour was dead. I’ve got the clippings, yet. And said, “We have heard of many miracles being done,” Mr. Coots said. And said, “Mr. Branham is a personal friend of mine, and all kinds of things has happened. But we have no record of anyone being raised out of the dead, especially in this funeral parlour.”

The Canadians had misunderstood it. And the next day the . . . My, the paper was lined up. He said, “Hundreds of people called from everywhere.” And Brother Perry in there, himself, testifying to the resurrection of his body over there and protesting the thing that he’d put in the paper. And so then it was understood it wasn’t there. It taken place in his home, and so where he was laying, dead. They’d never taken him to the funeral parlour yet.

Then I read the other night of where Irenaeus, I believe it was, or Saint Martin, that laid his body across his friend, after being hung. Now, that’s history. And laid on him for an hour, and the man come to life. And I see in the Bible where Elijah laid his body across a dead baby’s body, and it come to life. I think of the little boy yonder in Finland, when he was laying there dead, laying on the side of the road.

Then too, about two months ago, I believe it was, Gene, in the Newsweek; that they turned, what they call, “the Divine healers” loose in London. And let them go, praying for the sick. And there was about eighty percent more healing than there was by medicine. That prayer for the sick . . .

“Reader’s Digest” picked it up. And in America here, they, we got it wrote out here in “Reader’s Digest,” where they had examined for Divine healing. And they took a brother that prayed for the sick, and had a sick man, and had him praying for the sick. And then put a piece of lead foil (anyone knows, lead foil reflects that ray) upon, between the man and the man that was praying, the brother, his hand; and laid it down like this, and shot the picture of x-ray. And from the man’s hand, showed a visible reflection of a ray coming out of his hand, going to the other man. See, that’s right.

God know what He meant when He said, “They shall lay hands on the sick, they shall recover”.

Laying on of hands, of this man, upon a sick man, and the mechanical x-ray (O God.) showing the Light coming from the man’s hand. How can people be so stupid to say there’s no such a thing as Divine healing? See? Why, even the mechanical devices, it’s the machines that science has made is . . . A rebuke to their own ideas of these churches, saying, “There’s no such a thing as Divine healing and the power of God.”

How about the man in Chicago (just on and on, telling), how he put me before that meter there, and that thing, how that hand would register like a lie detector, of it. See?

And that woman laying, dying, put the test upon it. That even whirled that hand around, with enough power to send a radio message around the world forty times, and broke the machine down. That saint, dying, making her confession. Put it on a wicked man him dying; and when it did, it throwed the hand vice versa, across this other way, enough to break the machine down. That’s that infidel said, “If there is a God, and He is goodness of a good heart to His praises, would send that machine enough power to throw it around, there’s Something in that woman, making that power. And if on a wicked man, would throw it back the other way,” he said, “God, be merciful to me, a sinner,” and gave his heart to Christ. That’s right. Why, science knows.

And someday you’re going to find out, God is in you (See?), God Himself in the human being. God in us. Oh, how I thank God for those things, so wonderful (William Branham, The Uncertain Sound, p. 5:33-59). Full story: Quantum mechanics—the Bible is right!


The End-time Seed Sign

By William Branham (with commentary)

Luke 8:11, “Now the parable is this: The seed is the Word of God”.

Brother Branham said, “Watch, close now, when we bring this end-time seed sign. Jesus said, “Learn a parable of the fig tree” . . . the fig tree has always been the Jewish Israelite race of people. Joel said, “What the palmerworm left the caterpillar eaten,” and so forth. That was the stump, that the creeds and things eat the church down. But said, “I will restore, saith the Lord.”

Now, the Jews Israelites was cut off, Paul tells us, and the Gentiles grafted in again into the Kingdom. But notice. Jesus said, “Learn a parable of the fig tree.” Now, that tree, like Job saw, if it dies, will it live again? (Job 14:7-9).

Sure. He said, “Now, when you see the fig tree, and all the other trees . . .” Trees of what? There’s a Tree of Life, there’s a tree of creed (denomination), there’s a creed of nations. “When you see the fig tree, and all the other trees putting forth buds (boughs, fixing to leaf out) you say summer is nigh.” Notice, making a parable out of the nations [Luke 21:29-33].

Now, God deals with the Gentiles for a Bride, one here, and one there. But He deals with the Jews Israelites as a nation, not as a individual, as a nation. He’s always . . . that’s been God’s chosen nation. God chose them as a nation. Missionaries going into Jerusalem, and things—when Israel is saved, she’ll be a nation. The Bible says will be born in a day. That’s right. So Israel will accept Christ at one . . . as a nation; not just as individuals.

But notice now, what He said, let’s take it. Watch it clear. “When you see the fig tree begin to bud again, and all the other trees putting forth its buds . . .”

Now, everything just had a revival. The Jews are back in their homeland as a nation, flying their own flag, their own government, their own money. They are a nation for the first time for about . . . I guess, about Eighteen hundred years. Oh, more than that—about twenty-two hundred years, about twenty-two hundred years. Israel is a nation again. The oldest flag in the world, the six-point star of David, flies again, and for the first time for twenty-two hundred years. And Jesus said, “When she begins to put forth her bud, the time is at the door.” Israel, talking to the Jews”.

“Now, watch. He said when all the other trees begin to put forth . . . The Roman Catholic church has had the greatest sweep it’s ever had. The Protestant church has had the greatest revival it’s had. Billy Graham, and the Pentecostals has had the greatest revival they had. Oral Roberts, Tommy Hicks and the rest of them, great men—a revival.”

Nikita KhrushchevNotice. The powers has had a revival, the national powers. There’s a revival on now, who’s going to be the greatest power? Communism? Everybody you hear, preacher stand in the pulpit talking, “Oh, let us fear communism.” Nonsense. Show me the Scripture where communism will rule the world. Romanism will rule the world, not communism. Look at King Nebuchadnezzar’s vision, the Word of the Lord, the head of gold, brass on down into the Roman feet which was iron, and never changed. The stone came while it was still in the iron and smote it. Remember at the end it was mixed with clay, the weakness, clay and iron together [Daniel 2:36-44]. This great meeting they’ve just had up here between Khrushchev and Eisenhower . . . Khrushchev means mud, clay. You know what Eisenhower means in English? Iron. And to even make it so plain to the people, Khrushchev took off his shoe and beat the desk. They will not agree. What’s going to rule? Rome will rule. A confederation of churches, Catholicism will bind it together, and right there you are, the ruling power. The Bible says that. That’s the seed that can’t fail.

Now, look today. Isn’t this new pope inviting all the Protestant churches in? Aren’t they going? What about your Pentecostals? Same thing; the federation of churches. There you are. That seed’s got to come to pass. This has got to happen. It’s got to mature. It’s time for it to mature. The people, what’d they do? Organize and kept building greater buildings, and bigger organizations, greater denominations. And what all happened? The same thing, exactly what the Bible said they’d do.

That’s what the God-prophet, Jesus Christ, said would take place. The Jews Israelites would be restored, and there would be a great revival amongst them as a nation, coming together as a nation. There’d be a revival amongst the Methodists, Baptists, Presbyterian, and so forth, a revival amongst the Pentecostals, and there you are. And nation will be striving against nation, the seed matured. Israel become a nation after twenty-two hundred years. What’s happened? The churches all got together having a revival. All right, sir.

Now, another great seed was planted. He said in the last days, in II Timothy, the third chapter, there would come amongst the church a falling away from Bible faith. That’s right. Is that a seed? Is that a promise? Look at them today. Look at our churches. What are they doing? They’re organizing themselves together; they’re cooperating together, binding themselves together, failing, don’t believe in the Bible, don’t believe in the real true Word of God.

You say, “The Bible says this.” Them things are past. There is no such a thing. Oh, there is no such a thing. Days of miracles is past a long time ago. There is no such a thing as the baptism of the Holy Ghost. That was for a handful of people: twelve back there, the apostles. See? What is that seed? It’s maturing. It’s the end time sign see.

What did Jesus say? “When you see these things happening, lift up your head. Your redemption’s drawing nigh,” to the church. We seen she would fall away. [II Thessalonians 2:3]. All right. We find that. All right.

Now, we said in the last days Joel told us . . . that there would be a former and latter rain in the same season. How many Christians know that? Say, “Amen.” Sure. What.

Now, the other day, to my surprise, when I looked . . . Former and latter rain would come in the same season. Now, the word “former” in the Hebrew word (get your Hebrew lexicon and find out), the Hebrew word for “former” means (Heb.) ‘mowreh.’ Mowreh means “teaching.” There will come a teaching rain. What is it? Putting the seeds into the earth.

What’s gone on? Well, we find out that there’s been a teaching rain going on. The Baptist people, “A million more in ’44” members of the church was their goal. Billy Graham’s great revivals, our great evangelist, look what he done. Look at Oral Roberts and the Pentecostals. There’s been a teaching rain gone forth.

There’s been a national teaching rain, communism sowed amongst the people, every nation. [Chief rabbi of the United States Rabbi Stephen S. Wise is quoted in The American Bulletin (May 15, 1935) as saying, “Some call it Marxism—I call it Judaism”].

Assisi meetingThere’s been a Roman revival [Vatican II, October 11, 1962 – December 8, 1965). Do you know what happens? If they give the eastern part of Berlin back, that puts the Roman Empire, just exactly in the old circle it was in the time of Jesus. Certainly it does, perfectly [the ten toes of the image of Nebuchadnezzar’s dream (Daniel 2:42; 7:20, 24; Revelation 12:3; 13:1; 17:12-18)]. There’s a revival going on. What is it? A sowing. You don’t hear very much of Billy Graham no more, do you? What about Oral? What about the rest of them? You know the great revival fire’s not burning. What is it? It’s the end time seed sign. The words has been sown. What is it? [Tares (Matthew 13:25; Amos 3:3)]. Denomination will reap denomination. That makes them confederate themselves together (Isaiah 8:9-14).

But the Word of God has been sowed also. And when the Spirit of God begins to fall, the Word of God will live in the people. And that false bride that’s committed adultery out there, and brought herself into creeds, and sold out her birthrights will reap what? A confederation of church, that’s to be bound and burned like the thorns and thistles [Matthew 13:40; Hebrews 6:8]. But where the Word of God’s been sowed into the people’s heart, it will reap a Bride for Christ as certain as I’m standing here: End time signs.

What’s the matter, Church of God? What’s the matter with us? What’s the matter with you Baptists, you Presbyterians, Assemblies of God, Jesus Only, all the rest of you? What’s the matter with us? Can’t you see? The seed . . . Be careful what kind of a seed you’re taking in your womb of your heart. Don’t you take creeds; take the Word.

They’ve been talking so much about latter rain. Not discarding you latter rain brethren, but that’s not latter rain. If the latter rain would’ve been here, the power of God would’ve struck that thing, and she’d have swept the world. The latter rain’s fixing to come. What’s the matter? The church is manufacturing herself something just like Eve tried to do. She tried to have more light to manufacture something.

We’ve done the same thing, trying to make something in ourselves. Keep your hand off of it. Let God do it. Take His Word and believe It. Hold It in your heart. And when the rain begins to fall Life will take hold, and the Word will manifest itself.

I guess you think I’m crazy, but I’m not. If I am, leave me alone; I’m happy this way. So I believe God’s Word. What’s the matter with the church? Her womb, her—her open mind, has received all kinds of creeds and dogmas, and not the Word of God. When Christ come He found the same thing that Adam found, same thing Jehovah found. And here’s these signs, and the end time appearing, and the church hasn’t got the answer. That’s right. It’s time. The former rain’s went forth. That’s the reason Billy’s not doing much . . .

Jesus said, “As it was in the days of Sodom, so shall it be in the coming of the Son of man” [Genesis 18; Luke 17:28-30]. There was two Angels went down to the Sodomites. Remember, Lot once walked with Abraham. The church once walked in fellowship with Christ with the Word. But they sold out their birthrights for denomination. Now, she’s selling the whole thing and organizing into one big confederation of church. That’s exactly what happened to Lot. He went down there. Two Angels (Oral Roberts, and a Billy Graham, as it would be in this day) went down there, and placed the Gospel to them. What happened? A disgrace even come out of it.

But Abraham . . . One stood back with him. There’s One that he called God. And the sign that He performed there before them, what did it do? It proved what He was [Hebrews 4:12]. Abraham was the elected, because . . . Abraham had the promise. And now look, this is Abraham’s seed. The promise was not only made to Abraham, but his seed. Not his seed Isaac, it failed; it proved it did. But the seed, the faith that he had: no matter what the circumstances was, how against the nature it was, how much the doctor said it wasn’t so . . . Abraham, after he had the promise given to him, when it was impossible . . .

He married his sister about seventeen years old, his half sister. They had no children. And when she was sixty-five and he was seventy-five God appeared to him and said, “You’re going to have a baby by her.” Why, she took—he took His Word. He made ready for it. Twenty-five years after that nothing had happened. Now, he’s a hundred years old, and she’s ninety. That didn’t stop him a bit. “He staggered not at the promise of God through unbelief.”

That’s the faith. That’s the royal seed of Abraham. That’s the kind of seed that takes God’s Word. That’s the thing that’ll bring the Bride. That’s the thing that’ll meet Christ. He is the Word.

And if the church is sowed with something else besides the Word, it can’t go to meet Him. He hasn’t got a freak body with fungus on it. He’s got a perfect body, and He’s the perfect Word. And the church will be sowed and believed in the perfect Word. And the perfect Word and perfect Word will unite together as one flesh and one body, as a husband and wife is. Amen. (I’m not “amening” myself, but “Amen” means “So be it.”) I believe it, anyhow. Yes, sir.

The former rain’s went forth. The [latter] rain’s fixing to fall. What’s it going to bring forth? You just watch.

[Joel 2:23, “Be glad then, you children of Zion, and rejoice in the Lord your God: for He has given you the former rain in just measure [as the ground requires], and He will cause to come down for you the rain, the former [(Heb.) ‘Mowreh,’ teaching or autumn sowing] rain [mid-October to November], and the latter [(Heb.)’malqowsh’ or spring three months before harvest] rain [March to April] in the first month [its appointed season as aforetime]”

The first month of the year in Israel’s calendar is Nisan, and the first compulsory feast for which every adult male Israelite must attend the Temple in Jerusalem is the feast of Passover on Nisan 14 which in 2018 will coincide with Rome’s Good Friday on March 30. The Christian dispensation will end one Nisan 14 very soon. The first crucifixion of the Son of man in Matthew 27:50-53 types the crucifixion of the Son of God ending the Christian dispensation on the same date with “a great earthquake, such as was not since men were upon earth, so mighty an earthquake, and so great.” Los Angeles and a 1,500 x 300 – 400 mile segment of earth’s crust will sink beneath the Pacific (Joel 2:10; Luke 21:25-26; Revelation 6:12-17; 8:5; 11:19; 16:18-20; 18:21-23). “And every island fled away, and the mountains were not found.” Perhaps Mount Beaumont will subside, causing the earth beneath Cedar Lodge to slide into the valley below.

Brother Branham said, “When I heard that egg situation the other day, I went back in my book where the Lord spoke to me in 1931, and there I had written in my book, “In the last days, warn the people not to eat eggs or live in a valley.” And, see, not know what fallout and things would be, see, but yet the Lord forewarned that, way back thirty years ago, see, “Not to live in a valley, in the last days,” and, “Don’t eat eggs,” everything will be poisoned. See? (He Cares, do You Care? p. 21:99; There is only One Way Provided by God for Anything, p. 7:46; COD, p. 1181;Q427).

“The sun will become black as sackcloth of hair, and the whole moon become as blood [from volcanic eruptions]; and the stars of heaven will fall to the earth, as a fig tree casts her untimely figs, when she is shaken of a mighty wind. And the heaven will depart as a scroll when it is rolled together [as earth moves on its axis]; and every mountain and island were moved out of their places” (Isaiah 34:4-5; Jeremiah 4:24; Ezekiel 38:20; Joel 2:31; Nahum 1:5; Matthew 24:29; Revelation 6:12-14).

Nominal Christians are ignorant of the Word for their day. II Peter 3:3-4 prophesied, “That in the last days there will come scoffers, walking after their own lusts, and saying, [we are a Catholic house]. Where is the promise of His Coming? For since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. For they are willingly ignorant” that Catholicism was never Christian, that the Pentecostals put Christ without the camp (Romans 11:32; II Peter 4:3-4; Revelation 3:15), and the Church Ages, Christ’s mediation and redemption ended in 1963 when Christ returned in W_O_R_D form by the revelation of the Seven Seals. When nominal Christians reject this revelation, which IS Christ the fullness of the Word, they reject the Holy Spirit, crucify to themselves the Son of God afresh, and put Him to an open shame” (Matthew 12:32; I Corinthians 13:10; Hebrews 6:60).

After the Christian dispensation ends nominal Christians will preach their false salvation messages into the tribulation as (so-called) Jews are preaching their counterfeit ‘Oral Torah’ two thousand years after Christ “magnified the Law and made it honourable” (Isaiah 42:21). Today Lutherans and Anglicans are impersonating the Sardis Age that ended in 1750; Baptists and Methodists are impersonating the Philadelphia Church Age that ended in 1906, while Pentecostals are impersonating the Laodicean Church Age that ended in 1963. Ignorance “has a form of godliness but denies the [(Gk.) ‘dunamis’] inherent power thereof.” After the first half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week these so-called Christians, trying to do God a service without it being His will, will kill all who reject their pagan trinity of Gods (Revelation 13:15-18) as the Jewish House of Saud’s Wahhabi Islamists are killing dissenters!

Farsighted Joel foresaw how the antichrist spirit would apostatize Judah through four stages as riding four different coloured horses he would apostatize the Gentile churches through the first four Seals. He saw the Day of Pentecost when the Lord Jesus “would give Israel the former rain in just measure” quickening the foundational doctrine of the apostles and prophets to inaugurate and teach His Church in righteousness.

The tares had their revival first, the Holy Spirit has bound them in ecumenism and the gifts of the Spirit without the Word (Matthew 13:30). The “former rain” for the wheat Bride is the ministry of Brother Branham, the ‘Elijah’ of Malachi 4:5, 6b and Matthew 17:11, that restores us to the “former rain . . . once delivered to the apostolic saints . . . the foundation of the apostles and prophets” (Jude 3; Ephesians 2:20) that quickened and crowned the Israelite New Testament Church portrayed in Revelation 12:1; plus the mysteries of the Seven Thunders of Revelation 10, which are the revelations contained in the Seven Seals. It will be obvious to serious Bible readers that outside a clear revelation of Brother Branham’s Message there is no possibility of being born-again in this day. “God’s Word does not return to Him void, but will accomplish His pleasure, and it prosper in the thing whereto He sent it” (Isaiah 55:11).

Our “latter rain” will fall on the just and the unjust, and as nature’s rain quickens the wheat and the weeds, the “latter rain” of the Spirit will quicken the seed sown in each soul to manifest the life of that seed. “the wicked shall do wickedly: and none of the wicked shall understand; but the wise shall understand” (Daniel 12:10; Revelation 22:11). After our translation the Spirit will fall upon genuine Israelites of Jacob’s pure line as their “former rain” by the teaching ministry of two prophets anointed by the Spirit that endued Moses and Elijah of old. Three and a half years after our translation their prophets will be martyred, and Israel will receive its latter rain.

Hosea 6:1-3 prophesied in 780BC, “Come, and let us return to the Lord: for He has torn, and He will heal us; He has smitten, and He will bind us up. After two days will He revive us: in the third day He will raise us up, and we shall live in His Presence. Then we shall know, if we pursue the knowledge of the Lord: His coming forth is sure as the rising dawn [bringing salvation]; and He will come as the rain, the former and latter rain that waters and fertilizes the earth [refreshing and reviving us]”.

“Know” must be seen in the sense of Hosea 4:6: “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because you have rejected knowledge, I will also reject you from being a priest to Me. Since you have forgotten the Law of your God, I will also forget your children.” Like the heathen Greeks Paul addressed on Mars Hill (Acts 17:23), the Lord was “THE UNKNOWN GOD” to estranged, idolatrous Israel. Hosea was prophesying that in the third day, Israel’s elect would know the Lord through the “former rain” of the ministry of their two witnesses of Zechariah 4, Matthew 24:31 and Revelation 11, and the “latter rain” of revelation by the Spirit after their martyrdom, resurrection and assumption in the second half of Daniel’s Seventieth Week.

Christ’s end time Bride was called out from Laodicean apostasy under the “former rain . . . in the days of the Voice of the seventh angel.” We have come to know the Lord” as we mature under the S_O_N Light of the Spirit, pending the “latter rain” to energise us by the ‘third pull’ for the manifestation of the Sons of God and the translation.

“One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day” (II Peter 3:8). 780BC + AD2,017 = 2,797 means we are living well into “the third day” of Hosea’s prophecy wherein the nation of Israel will be born-again in one day, all 144,000 of them.

Acts 3:17-26, “And now, brethren, I know that you murdered your Messiah in ignorance (Luke 23:34; 13:27), as did also your rulers. But what God foretold by the mouth of all the prophets, that His Christ should suffer, He has fulfilled. [From the account of Jesus’ disciples on the Emmaus Road you will recall how difficult it was for them to accept that Messiah should suffer; even Peter was rebuked (Matthew 16:21-23), for the Israelites were expecting Messiah to evict the Romans and restore the Kingdom to Israel for the millennium (Acts 1:6; Romans 8:21). So repent, change your mind and be converted, that your unbelief may be blotted out, in order that the times of refreshing may come from the Presence of the Lord; and He shall [again] send Jesus Messiah who had been introduced, vindicated, and rejected: whom the heaven must receive until the times of restitution of all things, which God has spoken by the mouth of His holy prophets since the world began. ‘Moses truly said, The Lord your God will raise up a prophet like me from your brethren; Him you must heed in everything He says. And it shall be that every soul that does not hear that Prophet [Jesus Messiah], will be destroyed from among the people'” [as in Hosea 4:6].

“And all the prophets who have spoken, from Samuel and those who came afterwards, also proclaimed these days. You are the children of the prophets, and of the Covenant which God made with our fathers, saying to Abraham, ‘And in your Seed [singular] all the kindreds of the earth be will blessed. God, having raised up His Servant [the Seed], sent Him to bless you first, by turning every one of you away from your iniquities’.”

Words such as “kindred” and “seed” in Genesis agree with Revelation 1:7 and refer to a lineage running back to some progenitor, ancestry, race or tribal group with a common origin in Adam. Israelites became twelve tribes descended from the twelve sons of Jacob which divided into families which were divided into houses. Through rabbinical misinterpretation and their rejection of the prophets John the Baptist and Jesus Messiah Himself, the Israelites anticipated Messiah’s first Coming according to Scriptures relating to His third Coming, with outward material blessings upon the nation generally, and Talmudic dominion over “all the kingdoms of the world, and the glory of them” (Matthew 4:8). But Messiah’s great blessing as our KINSMAN Redeemer is inward and spiritual: the remission of past unbelief and new birth which turns us from our iniquities. His blessing was to elect Israelites first, and also to elect Gentiles of Adam’s race.

James 5:7, “Be patient therefore, brethren, unto the Coming of the Lord. Behold, the husbandman waits for the precious fruit of the earth, and has long patience for it, until he receives the early and latter rain.” [Your translation to the Wedding Supper of the Lamb and the millennium thereafter will more than compensate for your patient labour in bringing your flesh and mortal spirit unto submission so that the Token of Christ’s Life might be seen in you].

One more sign: the unwise virgin. Oh . . . Jesus said, just before the coming of the Bridegroom there would be a wise virgin with oil in her lamp, and one unwise. And the unwise virgin would wake up one day and find out that she didn’t have any oil in her lamp, when it become to the place, “Behold the Bridegroom cometh.” That’s what the shout is now. “Christ is coming.” And she woke up and found out she didn’t have any oil (Matthew 25:6).

Oil means “Spirit.” Spirit is what brings the Word to Life. The Spirit is the water that brings the Word to life. Throw it out . . . You say, “Well, what about these churches?” If they sow denominational seeds it’ll bring that to life. The Spirit of God will bring that to life (Genesis 1:11; Daniel 12:10; Revelation 22:11-12).

The Bible said, “The rain falls on just and unjust” (Matthew 5:45). Hebrews the sixth chapter says that the rain comes oft to dress the fruits that’s of the earth. But the thorns and thistles which rejoiced just as much and lived just as much by the rain as they can . . . “But by their fruits you shall know them” (Matthew 6:16). It’s exactly right. There you are. Now, when they seen that . . . See, the fruits are to be gathered; the rain’s fixing to fall. Denomination will hatch denomination; that’s all. But the Word will hatch Christ, the Bride. Certainly. Sow the Word of Seed. Now, when the wise virgin . . .

Have you noticed the Christian Business Men’s Voice? I speak for them internationally. I can’t pull no punches for them. This is the Word. Look. What about in the . . . Looky here at the Presbyterians, Episcopalians: hundreds of them everywhere trying to seek the Holy Ghost. They’re playing up a great big thing.

A precious minister friend of mine from Africa, fine man, godly man, I’ve asked him, “Don’t you know what it is, brother? What’s your ministry?”

He said, “I’m supposed to bring Babylon in.”

I thought, “Can’t you see, the very time that the unwise virgin wants some oil to make her seeds to grow also, that’s the time that Christ comes and she’s left out?” The great preacher Billy Graham has just said that we need a Pentecost, we need people back. Episcopalians wrote a great article, a folder that long, said, “We need speakers with tongues. We need Divine healers in the church having healing services, people out praying for the sick.” What are they trying to do? Get oil in their lamp. Exactly. That’s a end time seed sign. Amen. While she was trying to do that, the Bridegroom come and the Bride went in, and she was locked out. Oh, what a wonderful day we’re living in.

Just want to say one thing more: distress between the nations (Luke 21:25-26). Oh, my. Fearless sights in the heavens, do you believe that’s so? Look, we just take a couple of them . . . The nation’s been shook up just recently about signs. Did you see what this man in the orbit the other day . . .? He found things up there he never . . . Science don’t even know what they are. When he passed around the earth . . . Yet they’ve looked and looked and looked, but they didn’t see them. He thought his orbit was coming to pieces. It wasn’t so. His orbit was all right. Lights . . .

Look what’s just been over the . . . You’ve seen it in the radio, you saw it on television; it’s been in the newspaper: flying saucers everywhere. And the Pentagon let it out the other day (about six weeks ago) it wasn’t fictitious. They even showed it on television how they caught these saucers, with intelligence—lights that come down, hanging over the Pentagon like that, all over Washington, DC. And they caught it on radar, and had pilots up there. They’d come right in around them, surround around them, then move away with lightning speed. An intelligence, what is it?

Jesus said there’d be fearful signs, sights in the heavens, man’s hearts failing, fear, perplexity of times, distress between nations. Don’t you see that seed time is here now, the harvest time, the things the Bible said would come to pass? That seed that’s been planted, don’t you see it’s taken life and living? That’s what’s the matter.

Now, just one thing more. Listen. Before . . . Now, listen close. Don’t fail to find this now. Before the first coming of Jesus, the astronomers of India, magis . . . I’ve missionaried in India, and talked with magis about this. And they were watching. They were astronomers; they were watching the heavenly bodies. And they say God always declares Hisself in the heavenly body before He does in the earth, before He does anything.

And they said, “Why, when this . . . The three wise men went to worship this king that was to rule the earth, a baby king, that they followed a star, your Scripture says.” He said, “But frankly, there was three stars came together and made this one star.” And they say that . . . The Christian astronomer that I was talking to, or magi, he said, “That means that there were three races of people that this Man died for. The only three races there is Ham, Shem, and Japheth’s people. And when His Gospel has been preached to Ham, Shem, and Japheth’s people, they come together in His Gospel, then the return will be.”

That’s all right if he wants to believe that. Three is the number of perfection. But what do I believe that three was? What do we believe? It was a three of perfection showing that the trinity of God (Father, Son, and Holy Ghost) was made manifest in a Man, Jesus Christ, the one perfect Man. All other men had failed. Everything else had died. But here come a Man that couldn’t die: perfection, that even death couldn’t kill Him. Rose up again.

Three is the number of perfection. We all know that. Three is God’s number in His numerology. God is known by His numbers. Three is perfection, and seven is worship; twenty-four is worship; forty is temptation; fifty is Pentecost, jubilee (See?), so forth. All of His numbers, His numerals of God is perfected, is in perfection. Now, three is the number of perfection. Just before when the—(listen now close) when the little baby Christ was born, three stars went together and made the one morning star, that reflected the coming of a infant Christ, a perfect One.

William Branham[Right now three stars, Vatican City State, the City of London and Washington DC are coming together to wrest global hegemony in one world government to fulfil Isaiah 14:12: “How you have fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! You have been cut down to the earth, you have weakened the nations!”]

Now, what’s happened? We see a roar in the paper, across the television out across the nations, where five stars just fell in line with the world. What’s five? A number of grace. Every time those stars come, then something happens on earth. What taken place? Five stars fell in. What was it, a introducing of what?

Since then just look what’s taken place. Germany almost washed off the map. Some of the magi said that the world would burst like a watermelon. Every distressful things prophesied by them for the last days. Look what’s taken place. England, the other day, had a storm that blowed away seventy thousand houses one day. Disasters everywhere . . . California, Los Angeles liked to washed into the ocean. What is it? Beginning of sorrows. Earthquakes has picked up everywhere. Why is it? Five stars come in line: Grace, God’s grace.

Pillar of Cloud February 28, 1963. Life Magazine, May 17, 1963[That morning when those seven Angels come down [over Mount Sunset on about March 8, 1963] and blasted the earth, and rocks flew every way, [Brother Branham was caught into the mystic Cloud of Daniel 7:13 and Revelation 10:1-4 to complete the constellation] seven Angels stood there and said, “Return back to Jeffersonville, from where you come from, for the Seven Seals of the seven mysteries will be opened” (This Day this Scripture is Fulfilled, p. 21:176)]. What’s happened? An infant church (Hallelujah.), a Bride, infancy, that the power of God has begin to fall on her. She’s taking form: a Bride for this Bridegroom. That three stars meant His perfection of the heavenly Father, of the trinity becoming One on earth among us, God’s offices becoming one office. What happened now? It’s the Church of the living God coming together under the Word of God, and the astronomic heaven is announcing her approach. Amen. Might not believe that, but it’s the Word just the same. Yes, sir. What’s happening? . . . the church is coming forth. God’s going to have a church without spot or wrinkle. And she’s predestinated. God said so, He would have it. That makes it right. Who’s a member? I don’t know. I’m trusting to be myself; I’m trusting you are a member. But He’s going to have a body without spot or wrinkle.

And I believe that these latter-day signs and things that’s happening, every one of them is peeling together to show that Christ is ready to come for this Bride. As God in His Word made manifest in a man, a perfect man; so is God and His Word coming again, and making Himself manifested in a Bride. Not will do like Eve did, hybreed it to something else, but the unadulterated Word of God will be borned into that church, and she’ll stand like Jesus Christ did, with His Spirit anointing in His Word. Amen. I believe it’s the announcement now.

The prophet said, “There’ll come a day that won’t be called day or night, but in the evening time it shall be Light” (Zechariah 14:7). All you Bible readers know that. What happened? Civilization travels from the east to the west. China is the oldest civilization we have. Civilization begin in the east. It’s went with the sun, travelling west. Where’s it at now? The West Coast. If it goes any farther it’s back east again. See what I mean?

The same sun that rises in the east is the same sun that sets in the west, the same s-u-n. And the same S-o-n, Son of God that come to the earth to take a bride on the eastern people . . . And that bride polluted herself like Eve did, like Jehovah’s bride did. That same Son that shines there, that shined there with His same power upon Pentecost, to ripen the seed that He had planted, that same Son is shining now in the western hemisphere. To what? To ripen the seed that’s been planted to bring forth a Bride. The evening Light of the Gospel will bring forth a Bride (Amen.) for the Lord Jesus. There’s some of the evening seed signs, hundreds of them” (#62-0319, The End Time Seed Sign, par: 56-80).

Zechariah 14:16-19, “So it shall be that every one left [in the Book of Life] from all the nations which came against Jerusalem shall even go up from year to year [to tithe from the sufficiency of a year in a year] to worship the King [our Melchisedec, Jesus Messiah], the Lord of hosts, and to keep the feast of tabernacles” (Isaiah 66:23; Revelation 21:24-27). They could not possibly “go up to the feast” personally but may do so by representation. This is a metaphor indicating their entry into eternal Life on the eighth day of the feast following the general resurrection and white throne judgment. This verse is a striking method of depicting the entrance of Gentiles into the kingdom of God, indicating that then the various nations of the earth will be considered so many families of the one people of God. “But if any one of the families of the earth does not go up to Jerusalem to worship the King, the Lord of hosts, there will be no rain on them. And if the family of Egypt [Israel’s hereditary foe] does not go up [to Jerusalem], and present themselves, there will be no rain upon them, but there shall be the plague with which the Lord will smite the heathen that do not go up to keep the feast of Tabernacles. This shall be the sin of Egypt and the sin of all nations that do not go up to keep the feast of tabernacles”.

This is hyperbole like Isaiah 65:20: “There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that has not filled his days: for the child shall die an hundred years old; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.” For there will be no sinners in the renewed heavens and renewed earth and there will be no old men or children, much less hundred year old children, for we will all be glorified, ageless, and free from sin and corruption. Zechariah is employing a rhetorical enforcement of the thought that all ungodliness will then be in the Lake of Fire; New Jerusalem will be thoroughly holy. Revelation 21:27, “Nothing unclean or anyone practicing immorality or falsehood will ever enter into it, only those who are written in the Lamb’s Book of Life”. nl998.htm

Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations overseas. He pastors Bible Believers’ tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.

Bible Believers’ Church
Currabubula NSW
Australia 2342
e-mail Bible Believers URL Bible Believers’ Website
PowerPoint presentation The Second Coming of Christ
Subscribe click Unsubscribe click